标题: 一道GWD和Prep的题~ [打印本页] 作者: zhepeking 时间: 2011-1-27 20:31 标题: 一道GWD和Prep的题~ Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
A.Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
B.Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
C.Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering
D.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering E.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-1-27 20:50
lz请看： 这句话是这样的——Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington outnumber her letters to anyone else. outnumber是整句话的谓语动词。 which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886是修饰letters的。 这道题是有点儿复杂的。作者: zhepeking 时间: 2011-1-27 21:41
A中outnumbering 分词短语作状语为什么不可以呢？作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-1-27 21:53
动词由于分词，这是根据GMAT 的简洁原则： 实义名词>v.>adj.>抽象n.>分词或动名词>从句作者: zhepeking 时间: 2011-1-27 22:08
谢谢evelyn205205，这里的简洁原则我明白，不过本题中原句的逻辑重心在信的时间上，outnumber后面的只是其补充说明的作用，而E选项直接就把句子的逻辑重心改变了，不是说在原句没有明显语法错误的情况下，不要轻易改变其意思么，我想这里的意思也包括其要表达的逻辑重点吧~
但是答案是E，所以我觉得是不是A里面确实有致命的语法错误才导致不能选，而不仅仅是因为表达方式上不如E好作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-1-27 22:13
逻辑上讲，outnumber作为整句的核心是最合适的。but judging from it is demanding and not recommended. 语法上讲，outnumbering离其修饰的成分were written太远，在读到outnumbering的时候我已经confuse它在修饰谁了，语法上已经去就近修饰ending了（ending也是一个动名词）。作者: zhepeking 时间: 2011-1-27 22:27
谢谢版大，关于分词修饰的问题还是拿捏不好，尤其是该修饰的对象，我再理解理解吧