标题: OG12-112求解 [打印本页] 作者: legendyard 时间: 2011-1-25 19:46 标题: OG12-112求解 As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500. or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.
(A) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it (sense of vision)would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it (baby)were an adult with such vision.
(B) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind as an adult vision is legally blind:illogical
(C) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500; qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult
(D) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legally blind.
(E) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision, which would deemed legally blind for an adult, would be rated about 20/500. 选项E，OG的解释是 subordinate clause beginning with" which" is awkward and ambiguous. 请问怎么awkward and ambiguou了？一些NN认为which一般情况下就近指代，那用在这里不是很合适么。作者: legendyard 时间: 2011-1-25 19:50
当然选项E中which would deemed legally blind for an adult应为which would be deemed legally blind for an adult,我只是想知道which的用法，错在哪里了.还有再看看选项D中that引导的限定性定语从句，这里that指代的是前面的vision, 符合就近原则。那Gmat考试中限定性定语从句和非限定性定语从句的用法有什么特别规定么，他们的用法有什么差异呢？望请NN们指点一下哈。作者: zhepeking 时间: 2011-1-25 21:39
我的理解，E中which前有逗号，说明是非限制性定语从句，而非限制性的一个重要的特点就是去掉从句后，对主句意思基本没有影响，这里显然不是作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-1-26 16:10
这里最重要的问题是逻辑关系要搞清楚哦 人可以说瞎还是不瞎，视力不能说瞎还是不瞎 这是最关键的问题