ChaseDream

标题: 12版红OG662页26题求教 [打印本页]

作者: EdwardMa    时间: 2011-1-24 22:57
标题: 12版红OG662页26题求教
12版红OG662页26题:
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering
(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering
(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
答案是E选项,我的理解是这应该是一个并列句,就是letters were written..., outnumbered....这里,outnumber应该用和were written一样的过去时才对吧?反观A选项,用一个分词结构做定语来避免了时态的问题,不是更好吗?

而且,E选项的非限定性定从中,这个which到底是指代Susan Huntington Dickinson还是Emily Dickinson's letters?不是有指代不清的问题吗?

请赐教,谢谢!
作者: zhepeking    时间: 2011-1-25 00:15
A选项读起来相当别扭,和它所要修饰的letters相隔太远,这不是习惯的表达方式,如果非要用这种结构,我觉得outnumbering her letters to anyone else可以作为插入语放在Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson和were之间,不过这样句子的重心就发生变化了,也不符合要求,所以还是E最好,而且which是不用于修饰人的,这里这能修饰letters,没有歧义
作者: EdwardMa    时间: 2011-1-25 01:22
谢谢zhepeking这么晚还回帖!

关于修饰距离较远我明白,但是E的时态不是还有问题吗?Outnumber不是应该用过去式吗?
作者: EdwardMa    时间: 2011-1-26 22:41
顶一顶,盼高人。
作者: evelyn205205    时间: 2011-1-26 22:50
再多读读原文,你会发现outnumber是整句话的谓语动词,而“which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886”是用来修饰letters的,
比较一下A和E,E的表达更简洁咯
作者: EdwardMa    时间: 2011-1-26 23:24
谢谢evelyn205205

终于明白了,把定从去掉就好看很多:
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson outnumber her letters to anyone else.

这个可以理解为客观事实所以用一般现在时吧?
作者: sz061061    时间: 2011-1-27 08:31
这个可以理解为客观事实所以用一般现在时吧?
-- by 会员 EdwardMa (2011/1/26 23:24:46)

[/quote]

没错




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3