>
那么这道题的D改为such as by allowing之后,应该属于哪一种呢?
74，Growing competitive pressures may be encouraging auditors to bend the rules in favor of clients; auditors may, for instance, allow a questionable loan to remain on the books in order to maintain a bank’s profits on paper.
(A) clients; auditors may, for instance, allow
(B) clients, as an instance, to allow-----> clients, for instance, to allow
(C) clients, like to allow
(D) clients, such as to be allowing-----> clients, such as to allow
(E) clients; which might, as an instance, be the allowing of
答案是A。B和D的改动可以成立吗？都是对to bend的举例，应该没有逻辑主语的问题吧。另外这种对不定式的举例可以吧，因为就是把不定式当作名词一样来举例了。
偶觉得such as不能接不定式也不一定是绝对的。D的问题是allowing。
请NN指正。
B我没看出什么问题，但是为什么“偶觉得such as不能接不定式也不一定是绝对的。”老大你能举个例吗？
偶就是没有such as+不定式的例子。
les mm的例子是such as+介词短语，看来such as加介词短语也可以。
such as 可以加的包括：
1）名词/名词短语（包括名词短语的省略形式，但是必须保留介词（即LES MM的例子））
2）doing
3)what 从句
在没有看到例子前，偶只能仍然默认such as后不可以跟不定式，不然咋做题呀，呵呵。
偶就是没有such as+不定式的例子。
les mm的例子是such as+介词短语，看来such as加介词短语也可以。
对对对！啊呀偶搞错了，这个例子是such as + 介词短语。
1shine总结的极是！
谢谢2位NN。
有理
74，Growing competitive pressures may be encouraging auditors to bend the rules in favor of clients; auditors may, for instance, allow a questionable loan to remain on the books in order to maintain a bank’s profits on paper.
(A) clients; auditors may, for instance, allow
(B) clients, as an instance, to allow-----> clients, for instance, to allow
(C) clients, like to allow
(D) clients, such as to be allowing-----> clients, such as to allow
(E) clients; which might, as an instance, be the allowing of
答案是A。B和D的改动可以成立吗？都是对to bend的举例，应该没有逻辑主语的问题吧。另外这种对不定式的举例可以吧，因为就是把不定式当作名词一样来举例了。
偶觉得such as不能接不定式也不一定是绝对的。D的问题是allowing。
请NN指正。
个人认为B\ D的改动不成立。
原因如下：Also, this construction cannot link infinitives such as to bend and to allow. The infinitive is again incorrect in C and D
og说这句话有两个意思，一、such as不能连接不定式 二、不定式用在这里是错的
我的问题是，为什么不定式用在这里是错的？原因是to allow.不能作为to bend的例子吗？
还有，og说D requires by in place of to be.那么，by blablabla, 是谁的例子，是to bend还是rules?
请求nn帮助，谢谢。
由前几楼的讨论可认为such as 接不定式就是错的。
by doing应该修饰to bend.
偶就是没有such as+不定式的例子。
les mm的例子是such as+介词短语，看来such as加介词短语也可以。
我觉得这个说法有点牵强，les的例子很好，但是such as 后面的to 不是such as to 结构，而是alergic带的，allergic to sth这个短语的。
我今天刚好复习到这里，我不明白的是c 答案，like 不能用来举例子吗？？我怎末印象里面觉得可以呢？但就是想不出例子来，谁能帮帮我啊？？？？？
74，Growing competitive pressures may be encouraging auditors to bend the rules in favor of clients; auditors may, for instance, allow a questionable loan to remain on the books in order to maintain a bank’s profits on paper.
(A) clients; auditors may, for instance, allow
(B) clients, as an instance, to allow-----> clients, for instance, to allow
(C) clients, like to allow
(D) clients, such as to be allowing-----> clients, such as to allow
(E) clients; which might, as an instance, be the allowing of
答案是A。B和D的改动可以成立吗？都是对to bend的举例，应该没有逻辑主语的问题吧。另外这种对不定式的举例可以吧，因为就是把不定式当作名词一样来举例了。
大家都讨论了Ｄ，那Ｂ的问题在哪里呢？我觉得to allow 做为举例，形式上和to bend 比较对应，很舒服。
74，Growing competitive pressures may be encouraging auditors to bend the rules in favor of clients; auditors may, for instance, allow a questionable loan to remain on the books in order to maintain a bank’s profits on paper.
(A) clients; auditors may, for instance, allow
(B) clients, as an instance, to allow-----> clients, for instance, to allow
(C) clients, like to allow
(D) clients, such as to be allowing-----> clients, such as to allow
(E) clients; which might, as an instance, be the allowing of
把as instance改成for instance就对了，as instance成了把clients当成instance 比如 someone, as the most famous writer, wrote 50 books in her life. 在这里是当“作为”讲，而for instance的作用是引出下面的一个例子，用as的话句意就改变了
鄙见觉得TO ALLOW在这里的动作发出者也不清,更感觉象是CLIENT... TO ALLOW,所以有歧异.
不知此理解对否
such as 可以加的包括：
1）名词/名词短语（包括名词短语的省略形式，但是必须保留介词（即LES MM的例子））
2）doing
3)what 从句
那么这道题的D改为such as by allowing之后,应该属于哪一种呢?
那么这道题的D改为such as by allowing之后,应该属于哪一种呢?
鄙见觉得TO ALLOW在这里的动作发出者也不清,更感觉象是CLIENT... TO ALLOW,所以有歧异.
不知此理解对否
such as后面不能加句子,
such as是表示举例的标志只能加名词such as a,b and c
或分词such as doing sth,
such as +what从句
或such as +名词短语的省略形式但是必须保留介词如tests to identify food allergies, such as to milk;
74，Growing competitive pressures may be encouraging auditors to bend the rules in favor of clients; auditors may, for instance, allow a questionable loan to remain on the books in order to maintain a bank’s profits on paper.
(A) clients; auditors may, for instance, allow
(B) clients, as an instance, to allow-----> clients, for instance, to allow
(C) clients, like to allow
(D) clients, such as to be allowing-----> clients, such as to allow
(E) clients; which might, as an instance, be the allowing of
把as instance改成for instance就对了，as instance成了把clients当成instance 比如 someone, as the most famous writer, wrote 50 books in her life. 在这里是当“作为”讲，而for instance的作用是引出下面的一个例子，用as的话句意就改变了
不对吧,本意是说一种general的情况是竞争压力导致审计师扭曲法规,比如
可b这么一改变成并列,改变原意,而且og说Also, this construction cannot link infinitives such as to bend and to allow.
这种结构不能连接to do and to do的形式也就是说as a instances 不能做为并列连词
对对对！啊呀偶搞错了，这个例子是such as + 介词短语。
1shine总结的极是！
确定有这种用法吗?
by只说such as 有四种用法such as后面不能加句子,such as是表示举例的标志只能加名词such as a,b and c
或分词such as doing sth,
such as +what从句或
such as +名词短语的省略形式但是必须保留介词如tests to identify food allergies, such as to milk
若说such as by这里是省略形式,我又着实找不到省略了什么.
请nn指教
谁说的such as只能有这几个用法？再读读OG的解释，"The infinitive is again incorrect in C and D", 但没说The infinitive is incorrect after "such as". 这里infintive用错是因为不能表目的，而不是因为用在such as后面。
OG逻辑192题, E: Some family vehicles are used primarily not for commuting but for making short local trips, such as to do errands => to do表目的就等于for making short local trips to do errands
这题to bent rules..to allow/to be allowing, 表目的，错。用by allowing做装语，表方式，就等于 to bent rules...by allowing...对。
OG里的解释要看的准，OG里没说过的语法就算别的书里有，也不能照搬。到底还是要听ETS的，对不对？
jandjshi: well done.Your explanation makes a lot sense to me. Thanks.
谁说的such as只能有这几个用法？再读读OG的解释，"The infinitive is again incorrect in C and D", 但没说The infinitive is incorrect after "such as". 这里infintive用错是因为不能表目的，而不是因为用在such as后面。
OG逻辑192题, E: Some family vehicles are used primarily not for commuting but for making short local trips, such as to do errands => to do表目的就等于for making short local trips to do errands
这题to bent rules..to allow/to be allowing, 表目的，错。用by allowing做装语，表方式，就等于 to bent rules...by allowing...对。
OG里的解释要看的准，OG里没说过的语法就算别的书里有，也不能照搬。到底还是要听ETS的，对不对？
看到这里终于找到答案
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |