ChaseDream

标题: 蓝皮书 SC-41~求解 [打印本页]

作者: 一梦千寻    时间: 2011-1-19 01:01
标题: 蓝皮书 SC-41~求解
The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company's first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.


(A) that a company's first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

(B) that a company's first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even.


除了宾语从句中that不能省略,其他没看出什么语法考点~~~求指点~

作者: v19suffered    时间: 2011-1-19 02:07
B读起来舒服
没看过书上的解释,试着讨论一下
A&E,like的用法是否有误,like不能接句子吧
C&D,they指代什么呢?
请指正
作者: efrenreyes    时间: 2011-1-19 03:13
我来说下我的看法:

首先,advise的正确用法应该是,advise sb. to do sth. 或者 advise that 从句;advise sb. that 从句,是绝对错误的用法,所以立即排除选项C&D;

选项E,将原句中first line of defense in eluding offers ,改为了first line of defense for a company,逻辑的重心有所偏移,并且is the refusal 时态也不正确,应改为be the refusal ;

选项A&B的主要差别,我认为并不在like these 和such,而是even refuse 和refuse even,因为从句主语first line of defense 限定了对应的宾语必须是refuse这类动作的词,所以选项A的even refuse 不好,暗含的假设是consultants advise之前的情形是比refuse程度低的动作,与主语defense在逻辑上不能很好对应;

选项B的refuse even,就很明确了和defense对应的肯定是refuse这个动作,只不过consultants advise了要把refuse这个动作的范围扩大一点,even扩大到refuse to take calls 的程度。

以上仅是个人见解,其实本人的语法极烂,除了一些常见的固定搭配以外,对于选项的排除基本全靠逻辑推理…………
作者: joyfit    时间: 2011-1-19 04:55
我就是觉得B读的舒服...不知道其他为啥不对..楼上的有见解!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3