ChaseDream

标题: OG蓝皮书SC-Q84----想撕书了!!!! [打印本页]

作者: fgh67743185    时间: 2011-1-16 09:29
标题: OG蓝皮书SC-Q84----想撕书了!!!!
The computer company's present troubles are a result of technological stagnation, marketing missteps, and managerial blunders so that several attempts to revise corporate strategies have failed to correct it.

正确答案---that several attempts to revise corporate strategies have failed to correct


我选择的答案--so that several attempts at revising corporate strategies have failed to correct


OG说最后的结构是作为managerial blunders的定语从句,但我觉得不是要以原句的逻辑为准吗?而且前面说company现在有这些troubles,所以(so that)这些attempts会failed,也说得通啊,,,,,还有attempts在这里作名词,不表动作,用to do不合适吧?attempts at doing哪里错了呢???
哪位NN能帮我解答一下啊!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
作者: karevwang1011    时间: 2011-1-16 11:01
作名词的情况
attempt (to do sth/at doing sth)
~ (at sth)
~ (on sth)
so that several attempts at revising corporate strategies have failed to correct这个选项so that 之后SVO不完整,OG上好像也是这么解释的
作者: karevwang1011    时间: 2011-1-16 11:02
还有一点就是这里用so that 因果颠倒了吧
作者: fgh67743185    时间: 2011-1-26 04:26
还有一点就是这里用so that 因果颠倒了吧
-- by 会员 karevwang1011 (2011/1/16 11:02:41)

谢谢你的解释哈~!但我还是有疑问,为什么so that後面的结构不完整呢?是correct后面缺少宾语,还是?
而且,so that表示前面这些problems的影响,即战略无法修正,可以说得通啊?~
还望哪位NN进一步帮我解释一下~~~~~~~~~~!!!!!
作者: lss2010    时间: 2011-1-26 10:29
还有一点就是这里用so that 因果颠倒了吧
-- by 会员 karevwang1011 (2011/1/16 11:02:41)


谢谢你的解释哈~!但我还是有疑问,为什么so that後面的结构不完整呢?是correct后面缺少宾语,还是?
而且,so that表示前面这些problems的影响,即战略无法修正,可以说得通啊?~
还望哪位NN进一步帮我解释一下~~~~~~~~~~!!!!!
-- by 会员 fgh67743185 (2011/1/26 4:26:09)



og说correct后面没有object;

还有我觉得句子里都说了这些troubles are a result of....已经是一个因果关系了,貌似再加一个so that有点怪怪的。。。个人理解。。。

Open to discuss~~
作者: jianglindenise    时间: 2011-3-16 12:15
谢谢前辈们的解释~~~~

I've got it~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3