标题: 求教 新prep逻辑76 [打印本页] 作者: stevenvboy 时间: 2010-12-6 22:30 标题: 求教 新prep逻辑76 In response to mounting public concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented a program with the well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division. When the program began in 1994, the division's hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was 40 pounds per production worker. Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer's program has not met its goal are false. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? A. The amount of nonhazardous waste generated each year by the passenger-jet division has not increased significantly since 1994. B. At least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as had been produced in 1994. C. Since 1994, other divisions in the company have achieved reductions in hazardous waste output that are at least equal to that achieved in the passenger-jet division. D. The average number of weekly hours per production worker in the passenger-jet division was not significantly greater last year than it was in 1994. E. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year. 官方答案是E，但是小弟百思不得其解。 我的逻辑： program的目的是 reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division，而E却是说每个工人分配的工作量没减少。事实上，hazardous waste的量=每个工人产生的hazardous waste * 工人人数；而这3个因素中，只有部门工人人数是否变动未知。因此，觉得the number of production workers assigned是无关因素。作者: colasama 时间: 2010-12-6 22:42
division应该理解为部门，就是passenger-jet部门,指责的是这个部门减少一半浪费(总量)的目标没有达成 而 E是这么断句的：number of production workers //(that are) assigned to the passenger-jet division 而不是number of production （to which）workers （are）assigned