ChaseDream

标题: 求助 OG12 SC 68 [打印本页]

作者: chillstone 时间: 2010-12-4 17:12
标题: 求助 OG12 SC 68
68-The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
(A) that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but
(B) that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously with but also
(C) having been cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously but
(D) cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence of centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arising simultaneously but also
(E) cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but

看完OG解释和讨论贴后终于明白是说两个城市同时崛起的意思了，但是我很不明白independently后面为什么要加 of 呢？直接independently不是就可以表示两个城邦独立崛起了么？

作者: labellor 时间: 2010-12-6 17:18
parallel=> arose "simultaneously with" but "independently of" 同步但無關

作者: george01 时间: 2010-12-7 16:50
答案是A吗？应用have yielded，而不是yields

作者: chillstone 时间: 2010-12-8 18:02
谢谢2楼解答！！

作者: chillstone 时间: 2010-12-8 18:03
答案是E,OG的解释是用从句会显得很wordy,可以用分词修饰的，就不要用从句

作者: lss2010 时间: 2011-1-5 19:54
还有有些迷惑，如果用分词cut into...来修饰trenches，cut之前不是应该有个逗号吗？再者：cut into...还是做定语修饰trenches吗？那就不应该省略that了呀，因为that were cut中的that不是做作主语吗？

晕了。。。

Help!!! Plz...

作者: v19suffered 时间: 2011-1-7 11:38
个人理解，不对请轻拍
这个涉及到一个gmat的习惯用法
the first strenches that were cut into a 500-acre site本身并没有错
the first strenches cut into a 500-acre cite也能表达上面的句子意思
但是在gmat语法里头，根据简洁性的原则，优选后者
the first strenches cut into a 500-acre cite就是一个很简单的分词结构对名词的修饰，当然可以不用逗号
这个结构放在og12-68里面，主语是strenches, 谓语是have yielded

作者: v19suffered 时间: 2011-1-7 11:57
http://baike.baidu.com/view/235316.htm
当过去分词作为定语
　　作定语的过去分词相当于形容词,其逻辑主语就是它所修饰的名词.及物动词的过去分词作定语,既表被动又表完成;不及物动词的过去分词作定语,只表完成. 　　1. 过去分词用作定语,如果是单个的,常置于其所修饰的名词之前. 　　We must adapt our thinking to the changed conditions. 我们必须使我们的思想适应改变了的情况. 　　2. 过去分词短语用作定语时,一般置于其所修饰的名词之后,其意义相当于一个定语从句,但较从句简洁,多用于书面语中. 　　The concert given by their friends was a success.他们朋友举行的音乐会大为成功. 　　3.过去分词短语有时也可用作非限制性定语,前后常有逗号. 　　The meeting, attended by over five thousand people, welcomed the great hero. 他们举行了欢迎英雄的大会,到会的有五千多人. 　　4. 用来修饰人的过去分词有时可以转移到修饰非人的事物,这种过去分词在形式上虽不直接修饰人,但它所修饰的事物仍与人直接有关. 　　The boy looked up with a pleased expression. 男孩带着满意的表情举目而视.

作者: luckysss 时间: 2011-1-24 14:47
simultaneously with 我查不到这个词组啊……求指点……

作者: jiaying52 时间: 2011-2-22 11:19
过去分词做后置定语，ls分析的很令人受益

作者: FactOrFiction 时间: 2011-4-6 22:01
8楼，这里的短语是arise with.

作者: 小福娃欢欢 时间: 2011-6-11 04:43

8楼，这里的短语是arise with.

-- by 会员 FactOrFiction (2011/4/6 22:01:43)

arise with 又是什么意思。
然后为什么 independently后面用了 of?

谢谢

作者: lottl 时间: 2011-7-10 15:45
完整的应该是：A城市 arose simultaneously with （B城市） but (A城市 arose) independently of B城市，A城市与B城市同时但又独立崛起，或者分成2句话来描述就是：A arose simultaneously with B. But A arose independently of B.

作者: bob9603 时间: 2011-7-13 23:22

完整的应该是：A城市 arose simultaneously with （B城市） but (A城市 arose) independently of B城市，A城市与B城市同时但又独立崛起，或者分成2句话来描述就是：A arose simultaneously with B. But A arose independently of B.

-- by 会员 lottl (2011/7/10 15:45:26)

请问，C中的having been cut 和A中的 that were cut.....and that were arising 为什么是wordy？？？我不懂，请教你一下~

作者: jj449 时间: 2011-7-14 02:49
这个我试着回答一下：
1.根据我看的语法笔记里提到having和being，在GMAT语法里比较不讨喜，选的几率不大。
2. that were cut，“that were”是可以省略的，直接用cut就好。语法笔记里提到，N that is adj，太罗嗦，尽量变成adj N。

-- by 会员 lottl (2011/7/10 15:45:26)

请问，C中的having been cut 和A中的 that were cut.....and that were arising 为什么是wordy？？？我不懂，请教你一下~

-- by 会员 bob9603 (2011/7/13 23:22:20)

作者: nemiah 时间: 2011-7-14 09:17
Having been 语法上也是可以的，例如，the scientists, having amasses..., now drow the conclusion... 不过有the first 修饰trenches 就awkward 了

作者: mia113 时间: 2011-8-19 22:07

simultaneously with 我查不到这个词组啊……求指点……

-- by 会员 luckysss (2011/1/24 14:47:30)

我们不能说A arose simultaneously of B，只能说A arose simultaneously with B。
同理，不能说A arose independently with B,只能说A arose independently of B。
那这时如果要使两种描述并列，唯一的办法就是：
A arose simultaneously with but independently of B.
=A arose simultaneously with B.But A arose independently of B.

摘自：http://forum.chasedream.com/archiver/GMAT_SC/thread-468207-1.html

作者: jili_111 时间: 2011-12-26 12:57
我也刚做到这题，查了一下朗文和牛津，确实有这个词组的：simultaneous with:
eg: The withdrawal of British troops should be simultaneous with that of US forces

而且还有independent of，意思是：not connected with or influenced by sth; not connected with
eg：The police force should be independent of direct government control

因此这两个介词都是属于跟随副词的固定搭配，而不是和arise一起的固定搭配。

simultaneously with 我查不到这个词组啊……求指点……

-- by 会员 luckysss (2011/1/24 14:47:30)

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)