ChaseDream

标题: 蓝皮OG12-85 [打印本页]

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-4 11:41
标题: 蓝皮OG12-85
According to a study by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, companies in the United States are providing job training and general education for nearly eight million people, about equivalent to the enrollment of the nation's four-year colleges and universities.

(A) equivalent to the enrollment of
(B) the equivalent of those enrolled in
(C) equal to those who are enrolled in
(D) as many as the enrollment of
(E) as many as are enrolled in

OA ：E

为什么E中要补出ARE呢？这应该是宾语比较吧？

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-4 21:26
顶一下~

作者: sheikh239 时间: 2010-12-5 03:45
不是补出are 是省略the people

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-5 09:18

不是补出are 是省略the people

-- by 会员 sheikh239 (2010/12/5 3:45:15)

。。。那后面的ARE是怎么回事呢？根据the people来的么？多谢解答

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-6 20:30
UP

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-8 00:34
UP

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-9 23:11
UP

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-10 18:07
UP

作者: 881119 时间: 2010-12-10 19:26
nearly eight million people, about equivalent to the enrollment of the nation's four-year colleges and universities.

nearly eight million people和划线部分比较

nearly eight million people， about as many as （the people）are enro。。。。

这题白勇语法里有。我当时也做错了

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-10 19:43

nearly eight million people, about equivalent to the enrollment of the nation's four-year colleges and universities.

nearly eight million people和划线部分比较

nearly eight million people， about as many as （the people）are enro。。。。

这题白勇语法里有。我当时也做错了

-- by 会员 881119 (2010/12/10 19:26:18)

那是不是意味这as后面谓语的补出和后面的主语对应？和as前面没关系呢？

作者: stellina 时间: 2010-12-11 13:17

-- by 会员 881119 (2010/12/10 19:26:18)

那是不是意味这as后面谓语的补出和后面的主语对应？和as前面没关系呢？

-- by 会员 jbc88 (2010/12/10 19:43:31)

建议你去看下有个叫比较之庖丁解牛的东西～

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-11 19:10

-- by 会员 881119 (2010/12/10 19:26:18)

那是不是意味这as后面谓语的补出和后面的主语对应？和as前面没关系呢？

-- by 会员 jbc88 (2010/12/10 19:43:31)

建议你去看下有个叫比较之庖丁解牛的东西～

-- by 会员 stellina (2010/12/11 13:17:52)

啊。又是这位美女。。美女几次救我于纠结之中的义举，本人深表感谢。

但是，这个比较之庖丁解牛我是看后才发了这个题目的。里面有个例句，让我费解不已。

Sand road costs twice as many to build as stone road do(主语比较,）

-- by 会员 cwang (2005/4/4 11:44:00)

就是这句。如果说as后面谓语要和后面的主语一致的话，为啥这里是DO？

纠结啊 a a

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-12 17:39
up

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-12 20:40
UP`

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-13 10:29
丿

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-13 18:46
丿

作者: stellina 时间: 2010-12-14 01:14

但是，这个比较之庖丁解牛我是看后才发了这个题目的。里面有个例句，让我费解不已。

Sand road costs twice as many to build as stone road do(主语比较,）

-- by 会员 cwang (2005/4/4 11:44:00)

就是这句。如果说as后面谓语要和后面的主语一致的话，为啥这里是DO？

纠结啊 a a

-- by 会员 jbc88 (2010/12/11 19:10:51)

好奇怪，我怎么觉得应该是does的。。

求牛牛解答！

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-14 12:54

但是，这个比较之庖丁解牛我是看后才发了这个题目的。里面有个例句，让我费解不已。

Sand road costs twice as many to build as stone road do(主语比较,）

-- by 会员 cwang (2005/4/4 11:44:00)

就是这句。如果说as后面谓语要和后面的主语一致的话，为啥这里是DO？

纠结啊 a a

-- by 会员 jbc88 (2010/12/11 19:10:51)

好奇怪，我怎么觉得应该是does的。。

求牛牛解答！

-- by 会员 stellina (2010/12/14 1:14:34)

求啊求啊

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-14 20:05
UP

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-14 23:39
JFDFSA

作者: stellina 时间: 2010-12-15 00:09

但是，这个比较之庖丁解牛我是看后才发了这个题目的。里面有个例句，让我费解不已。

Sand road costs twice as many to build as stone road do(主语比较,）

-- by 会员 cwang (2005/4/4 11:44:00)

就是这句。如果说as后面谓语要和后面的主语一致的话，为啥这里是DO？

纠结啊 a a

-- by 会员 jbc88 (2010/12/11 19:10:51)

好奇怪，我怎么觉得应该是does的。。

求牛牛解答！

-- by 会员 stellina (2010/12/14 1:14:34)

求啊求啊

-- by 会员 jbc88 (2010/12/14 12:54:55)

后面那会不会是subjunctive verb。。

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-15 11:43

对主谓宾全的句型
主语比较： A do sth than B do.（AB为对等名词，加do是为了显示这是一个可以发出动作的名词，因而确定是主语，进而确定是主语对比）
介宾比较 A do sth of C1 by D1 than of C2 by D2.（C1C2，D1D2对等名词）
宾语比较 A do C1 than C2.(C1C2为对等名词）
状语比较A do sth than usual/everbefore/people expected(直接加状语）
ETS就这几下子，原则就是清楚地指示什么跟什么比。

AS族的比较大同小异，as 可单独引导比较，也可以复合成as many as, as hard as 等形式，但ETS宗旨不变，如
Sand road costs twice as many to build as to manintain(类似于介宾比较）
Sand road costs twice as many to build as stone road do(主语比较,）
Sand road costs the govement twice as many to build as the residents.(宾语比较）

There be 句型等同于一般的主谓宾俱全的句型
OG89
There is one PC for every 32 pupils in American four time as many as there were four years ago(主语比较)
There is one PC for every 32 pupils in American four time as many as DVD player(宾语比较)
There is one PC for every 32 pupils in American four time as many as for school teachers.(介宾比交)
There is one PC for every 32 pupils in American four time as many as in china(介宾比较)

-- by 会员 cwang (2005/4/4 11:44:00)

通过CWANG同学的神贴比较庖丁解牛来看。

宾语比较是不会补助动词的。

而此题中的people和people比，应该是宾语比较，却补了助动词are。

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2010-12-15 12:02
感觉应该是does.

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-15 18:36

感觉应该是does.

-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2010/12/15 12:02:47)

感谢~ 如果方便，斑竹去那贴改一下吧。

方便后来人。。

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-15 21:34

但是，这个比较之庖丁解牛我是看后才发了这个题目的。里面有个例句，让我费解不已。

Sand road costs twice as many to build as stone road do(主语比较,）

-- by 会员 cwang (2005/4/4 11:44:00)

就是这句。如果说as后面谓语要和后面的主语一致的话，为啥这里是DO？

纠结啊 a a

-- by 会员 jbc88 (2010/12/11 19:10:51)

好奇怪，我怎么觉得应该是does的。。

求牛牛解答！

-- by 会员 stellina (2010/12/14 1:14:34)

求啊求啊

-- by 会员 jbc88 (2010/12/14 12:54:55)

后面那会不会是subjunctive verb。。

-- by 会员 stellina (2010/12/15 0:09:09)

subjunctive verb是什么？虚拟？不会吧。。

作者: 紫小妮 时间: 2010-12-16 06:18
are enrolled 岂不变被动了
刚才还想说因为语态变了所以应该补出are
发现不是不应该用被动

应该用does吧

BTW 我看XDF的语法精讲那本说省略句要尽量补出助动词
但后来又看了庖丁解牛弄得我现在很confused
希望斑竹点解下

作者: stellina 时间: 2010-12-16 11:15
are enrolled没有错啊，这些人本来就是被enroll进去的。。。你去查查enroll的用法哈～

我也觉得是用does。

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-16 14:50
顶你

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-17 00:31
出

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-17 15:24
r rrr

作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-12-19 20:54
UUYUYUF

作者: monoecy 时间: 2012-7-30 15:19
爲什麽enrollment 不能和people 比!!?
enrollment 有註冊人數的意思吖~~~

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)