标题: GWD-25 疑答案有误 [打印本页] 作者: eshopaholic 时间: 2010-11-30 22:11 标题: GWD-25 疑答案有误 In two months, the legal minimumwage in the country of Kirlandia will increase from five Kirlandicdollars(KD5.00) Per hour to KD5.50 per hour. Opponents of this increase have argued thatthe resulting rise in wages will drive the inflation rate up. In fact its impact onwages will probably be negligible, since only a very small proportion of allKirfandic workers are currently receiving less than KD5.50 per hour. Which of the following, if true,most seriously weakens the argument? A. Most people in kirlandia whoare currently earning the minimum wage have been employed at their current jobs for less than a year. B. Some firms in Kirlandia havepaid workers considerably less than KD5.00 per hour, in violation of kirlandic employment regulations. C. Many businesses hire traineesat or near the minimum wage but must reward trained workers by keeping their paylevels above the pay level of trainees. D. The greatest growth inKirlandia’s economy in recent years has been in those sectors where workers earn wages that tend to be much higher than the minimum wage. E The current minimum wage isinsufficient for a worker holding only one job to earnenough to support a family ,even when working full time at that job. 大家看下选什么？作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2010-12-1 01:55
C is the correct answer.
The companies mentioned in C has to pay more to their trainees if the minimal wage rate is changed, thus potentially driving up inflation rate.作者: woaihenglia 时间: 2010-12-1 03:19
请教一下，像楼主这种weaken体型，是不是绝大部分是找削弱conlusion的选项啊，还是用外因来削弱啊？麻烦解答下，跪谢作者: woaihenglia 时间: 2010-12-1 03:22
那照你这么分析，应该是找外因了，对不？作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2010-12-1 07:04
For weaken questions, you can either attack the premises in the stimulus, or attack the assumption in the stimulus, or present a counter example, or other ways to make the argument less likely.作者: eshopaholic 时间: 2010-12-1 09:55
我选了C, 答案B作者: lly1972823 时间: 2011-2-21 21:38
DING !@