More than thirty years ago Dr. Barbara McClintock, the Nobel Prize winner, reported that genes can “jump,” as pearls moving mysteriously from one necklace to another.
(A) as pearls moving mysteriously from one necklace to another
(B) like pearls moving mysteriously from one necklace to another
(C) as pearls do that move mysteriously from one necklace to others
(D) like pearls do that move mysteriously from one necklace to others(B)
(E) as do pearls that move mysteriously from one necklace to some other one
Choice B, the best answer, correctly and idiomatically uses the preposition like to introduce a comparison that is expressed, in a prepositional phrase. In A, as is used unidiomatically; in comparison, as is properly employed as a conjunction introducing a subordinate clause. Choices C, D, and E are all faulty because the verb do suggests that the migrating pearls are presented as a real phenomenon, not as a figurative illustration. 请教这句话是否表示虚拟的意思?为什么这里不可以用as ...do....的形式,好像在大全只有这题是like sth doing的用法。Also, in D, like is used ungrammatically to introduce a subordinate clause (pearls do...); and in E, the phrase some other one, substituted for another, is awkward and wordy.这题我是这样理解的:
1.这题考的是比喻,象我们中学里常考的修辞方法,从这个角度考虑,只能选like,不能用as
2.在B和D中,B是一个介宾结构,D是一个句子。like又不能引导一个句子,所以选B。
请NN指正。
而且,即使可以用AS,那从平行的角度上,后面重复的动词应该用AS CAN,而不是别的。
这样,就更能坚定的选,LIKE。
请指教!
同意楼上MM.
选项要突出CAN这一层意思,C,D,E都只是在表达一种客观现象.
顶一把小蚂蚁,这个逗号用的好像很古怪。
LIKE A, B do
你说AB之间干吗要有逗号.
而且,即使可以用AS,那从平行的角度上,后面重复的动词应该用AS CAN,而不是别的。
这样,就更能坚定的选,LIKE。
请指教!
一开始我也是这么认为,现在想想,就算是重复CAN也不对.
AS PEARLS CAN 还是表达了,pearls实际上存在"CAN"的能力.
而pearls,实际上也不"CAN".
举个例子:
你能一跳30多米高,就像一只小猫能一跳3000多米高一样.
********实际上小猫也不能一跳3000多米高
所以重复CAN,就是承认了"pearls 能(can) jump (承认了小猫能跳3000米)" 是一个事实.
只有B,用like,巧妙地避免了引出动词对比. 只比较pearls和genes.
而且,即使可以用AS,那从平行的角度上,后面重复的动词应该用AS CAN,而不是别的。
这样,就更能坚定的选,LIKE。
请指教!
我也觉得应该是这样.不知其他大N如何看待.
as sth do
或者like sth
一开始我也是这么认为,现在想想,就算是重复CAN也不对.
AS PEARLS CAN 还是表达了,pearls实际上存在"CAN"的能力.
而pearls,实际上也不"CAN".
举个例子:
你能一跳30多米高,就像一只小猫能一跳3000多米高一样.
********实际上小猫也不能一跳3000多米高
所以重复CAN,就是承认了"pearls 能(can) jump (承认了小猫能跳3000米)" 是一个事实.
只有B,用like,巧妙地避免了引出动词对比. 只比较pearls和genes.
其实是ETS在自圆其说了,没什么逻辑性。珍珠固然不能自己移动,但是基因何尝就能自己跳呢?既然是用了拟人手法,就不要追究现实中存不存在。珍珠怎么就不能从一条项链跑到另一条呢?工匠不是就是这么做项链的吗?只不过这里是拟人化,没提到是怎么移动的罢了。
个人意见。
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |