ChaseDream

标题: GWD-9-Q19 没看到讨论结果！谢谢大家！！！ [打印本页]

作者: saya630 时间: 2010-11-17 21:39
标题: GWD-9-Q19 没看到讨论结果！谢谢大家！！！

GWD-9-Q19:

In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted within the scope of his or her authority and if the corporation benefited as a result.

A.a corporation commits a crime whenever one of its employees commits a crime, if the employee acted

B.a corporation is committing a crime whenever one of its employees committed a crime, if those employees were acting

C.corporations commit a crime whenever one of its employees does, on the condition that the employee acts

D.corporations commit crimes whenever an employee of those corporations commit a crime, if it was while acting

E.the corporation whose employees commit a crime, commits a crime, whenever the employee acted

麻烦你们帮我解释一下！谢谢

作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2010-11-17 22:11
The answer is A, but even A has some minor problem itself.

作者: kevin0214 时间: 2010-11-18 00:00
选A，同意sdcar2010的说法，其实A也有够恶心的……
B正在进行时没道理，而且会导致跟后面不平行
C its没有指代。
D 说一个员工同时属于几个公司，逻辑错误，it没有合理指代
E the特指不对，因为前面没有提到过某个公司，加上定语从句就变成了“那个雇员们犯了罪的公司犯了罪”，限定了公司，扭曲了原意

作者: saya630 时间: 2010-11-18 00:59
en ! 理解了谢谢！！

作者: Gump5021 时间: 2011-11-18 20:43

The answer is A, but even A has some minor problem itself.

-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2010/11/17 22:11:00)

前面在论坛上看到有NN讲，法律条文用-ing形式，借这个题求证一下，能不能具体讲讲这个情况？谢谢

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)