ChaseDream

标题: HELP......THANKS SO MUCH [打印本页]

作者: yizihuishi    时间: 2010-11-16 19:55
标题: HELP......THANKS SO MUCH
41 GWD-29-Q28
Astronomer:Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter’s atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were.Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter’s outer atmosphere.After the fragments’ entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur.The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter’s outer atmosphere does contain sulfur.Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?B

A.The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second provides evidence in support of the truth of that claim.为什么不选??

B.The first and the second are each considerations advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument.

C.The first is a circumstance for which the astronomer seeks to provide an explanation; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the explanation provided by the astronomer.

作者: s2206001    时间: 2010-11-16 23:20
我尝试解答一下:

第一个黑体字,其实是指出一个质疑点,不过接下来就否定了这个质疑证据,所以目的是加强的结论的。

第二个黑体字,是用来解释第一个质疑点,以增强结论的。

所以说,两个都是用来支持结论的。不过,如果有更好的选项可以选择更好的。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3