ChaseDream

标题: og214 [打印本页]

作者: baby911 时间: 2004-5-8 10:33
标题: og214

OG214选项应该从哪个方向判断？怎么不知道如何下手？

作者: JerryGuan 时间: 2004-5-8 22:07

214. Although the term "psychopath" is popularly applied to an especially brutal criminal, in psychology it is someone who is apparently incapable of feeling compassion or the pangs of conscience.

(A) it is someone who is

(B) it is a person

(C) they are people who are

(D) it refers to someone who is

(E) it is in reference to people

In choices A and B, the pronoun it simultaneously refers forward to someone (or a person) and backward to the term "psychopath" As a result, the sentence asserts illogically that the term is actually a kind of person rather than a word referring to a kind of person. Choice C repeats this fault and adds an error in agreement: they (plural) does not agree in number with the term (singular). E omits a main verb, such as applied, that, in grammatical context here, is required after is. Also, the word people incorrectly shifts number from singular to plural. In choice D, the best answer, the verb refers is correctly used after it, and the alignment of pronouns and antecedents is both logical and grammatical.

第一步搞清代词的指代；

第二步理解后半句的意思；

第三步选择refer还是is

第四步挑一个简洁的有效的选项。

作者: irenelj78 时间: 2004-8-7 08:26
我还有个地方不明白，E omits a main verb, such as applied, that, in grammatical context here, is required after is.，这句话是什莫意思？be in referance to不也可以的吗？请指点，谢谢。

作者: bloodcherry 时间: 2004-8-27 08:27

以下是引用irenelj78在2004-8-7 8:26:00的发言：
我还有个地方不明白，E omits a main verb, such as applied, that, in grammatical context here, is required after is.，这句话是什莫意思？be in referance to不也可以的吗？请指点，谢谢。

顶一下，in referance to显然没有refer to简洁,能用动词尽量用动词

但是我不明白OG里这句话的解释,请哪位NN给解释一下E omits a main verb, such as applied, that, in grammatical context here, is required after is.，

作者: jnlvo 时间: 2004-8-27 08:42
可能E应该it is applied in reference to 。applied语法上不能省。当然加了表达也复杂。

作者: jnlvo 时间: 2004-8-27 08:42

可能E应该it is applied in reference to ，applied语法上不能省。当然加了表达也复杂。

作者: Euodia 时间: 2004-12-29 14:14

同问。

为什么不可以是

the term "psychopath。。。。 in psychology。。。 it is in reference to people

而非要是

the term "psychopath 。。。。in psychology。。。 it is apllied in reference to people

作者: Euodia 时间: 2004-12-30 18:34

作者: TakeItEasy1 时间: 2005-5-15 15:49

为什么不可以是

the term "psychopath。。。。 in psychology。。。 it is in reference to people

而非要是

the term "psychopath 。。。。in psychology。。。 it is apllied in reference to people

同问``

作者: TakeItEasy1 时间: 2005-5-15 15:53

为什么不可以是

the term "psychopath。。。。 in psychology。。。 it is in reference to people

而非要是

the term "psychopath 。。。。in psychology。。。 it is apllied in reference to people

不好意思,在另外一个帖子里找到了,

好象是因为in reference to 是介词词组,前面不加个实译动词怪别扭的

不知道对不对?

作者: Avantasia 时间: 2005-6-1 16:01
我也不是很清楚, 请教大家!

作者: best555tw 时间: 2005-6-11 12:08
up up

作者: 薰衣紫草 时间: 2005-6-12 09:50
4 in/with reference to something formal used to say what you are writing or talking about, especially in business letters:

I am writing to you in reference to the job opening in your department

term自己怎么可以澄清要说的东西, 必然是被引用来说明.

作者: foreinter 时间: 2005-7-3 10:45

以下是引用薰衣紫草在2005-6-12 9:50:00的发言：
4 in/with reference to something formal used to say what you are writing or talking about, especially in business letters:

I am writing to you in reference to the job opening in your department

term自己怎么可以澄清要说的东西, 必然是被引用来说明.

还是版主说得有道理，感觉很多地方句意还是最根本的出发点。

作者: brent_zhang 时间: 2006-1-12 14:36

以下是引用薰衣紫草在2005-6-12 9:50:00的发言：
4 in/with reference to something formal used to say what you are writing or talking about, especially in business letters:

I am writing to you in reference to the job opening in your department

term自己怎么可以澄清要说的东西, 必然是被引用来说明.

我在longman里面还查到这个例句：

It is precisely in reference to such functions that the issue of royal control arises.

上面这两个例句应该怎么翻译啊

另外请哪位解释一下这个词组的意思和用法，期待NN

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-1-12 14:51:40编辑过]

作者: yoyobaobao 时间: 2007-3-12 11:52

本来想查这道题的别的问题，看到大家都在问为什么og 解释说"E omits a main verb, such as applied, that, in grammatical context here, is required after is."

我想,it is在这里应该是"形式主语"吧,我们用形式主语时(像it is said that.....)不是都会在it is 后面加一个动词吗?所以og 才说E omits a main verb,也不知道对不对,请指正.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-3-12 11:52:49编辑过]

作者: yoyobaobao 时间: 2007-3-13 10:14

不知道对不对啊，期待大虾们指点！

作者: fionajiang 时间: 2007-3-13 10:54
有apply就不要 in reference to 了吧.OG的意思是这里应该用一个实意动词.

作者: yoyobaobao 时间: 2007-3-14 05:22
还是想问这个是不是因为“形式主语”，所以要用实意动词，感谢！

作者: huoduoduo 时间: 2007-3-24 12:01

貌似还是没看到一个结论，NN帮忙解释一下吧

作者: yore101 时间: 2007-9-7 12:04

以下是引用yoyobaobao在2007-3-14 5:22:00的发言：
还是想问这个是不是因为“形式主语”，所以要用实意动词，感谢！

不是形式主语，就是代词指代前面让步从句的主语，后面的who是定语从句不是真正的主语。

作者: huangyh03 时间: 2007-11-6 10:02
up

作者: rhine521 时间: 2008-8-3 13:25

以下是引用薰衣紫草在2005-6-12 9:50:00的发言：
4 in/with reference to something formal used to say what you are writing or talking about, especially in business letters:

I am writing to you in reference to the job opening in your department

term自己怎么可以澄清要说的东西, 必然是被引用来说明.

简洁而明确

作者: phyroc 时间: 2008-9-22 18:10
OG11中说in reference to前面要用used，可能和OG10中说要用applied一个意思吧

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)