标题: OG12-36 求指挥 [打印本页] 作者: kobe198879 时间: 2010-11-10 20:26 标题: OG12-36 求指挥 Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the fi rst woman to draw a soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.
(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become (B) 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become (C) 22 and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being (D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was (E) 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being
1.把A选项第一个was去掉让injured表示伴随可以吗？？ 2.had become 是如何在瞬间看出来的？？作者: kevin0214 时间: 2010-11-10 20:45
去掉was有各种歧义。过去分词作状语最好放在主句之前，如果放在主句之后，会有可能就近修饰名词作定语的歧义，除非主句除了主语没有其他名词。另外，过去分词作状语表示过去和完成的动作，发生在主句的动作之前，这里显然是不对的，说她还没当兵之前就受了三次伤，虽然不是说不可能，但没有必要地改变了句子原意。 had become就是瞬间看不出来，也没有问题吧，比较几个选项，发现时态有差异自然就要考虑用哪个时态了，如果每个选项都是一样的时态，那也不需要去细想它为什么用这个时态。作者: 能量毛豆儿 时间: 2011-9-5 01:55
楼上解释好到位