Guidebook writer:I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?
A.The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
B.Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
C.The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
D.The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
E.The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930. 答案选D，我选的是B，我觉得因为1930后游客多了人去的多所以质量保存的没有1930年前人少的时候好，而不是和那些工人的技术有关，答案的意思不是木工手艺越好，建筑被废弃使用的可能性就越小，那么他们就会经常被使用，所以质量保存也就差,我觉得两个答案都说的通，求助牛牛帮我否定B 作者: zhangyunkai5 时间: 2010-10-29 17:04
原文中有说客人的多少和OCW的质量之间的关系了吗？ 压根就没有提到过，你为什么有那个假设？ 原文的结论是OCW的质量是不是跟造它的人的技术有关 只有CD直接说了OCW的质量问题 要在这两个中选才是合适的 逻辑不能发散 原文没说你就不知道 B选项中根本就没有提及质量的事 无关选项作者: eshopaholic 时间: 2010-10-29 17:07
楼上解释很到位作者: hjxsparrow 时间: 2010-10-29 17:08
赠你五大无关选项
