ChaseDream
标题: 裸机，看不懂~~~求助~~~ [打印本页]
作者: serenashu 时间: 2010-10-19 15:53
标题: 裸机，看不懂~~~求助~~~
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances, a petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.
Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?
A.Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
B.In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
C.The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
D.There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
E.The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
答案是B，没看懂~~~
作者: 2010 时间: 2010-10-19 17:01
情况大概是这样的：
在一个州，每个城&镇都有地方禁烟法规，现在要想通过一个民众签名投票petition搞出个州的禁烟法规，但是工作人员只问群众“Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” ，（并没有明确说明这个是） The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public（新法规的特征）.
问你哪种情况下会让投票者以为这个仅仅是把地方禁烟法规扩充为州的禁烟法规？
BIn rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
把题设最后一句
The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public 新法规的特征产生的条件排出了，断了桥，于是新的法规没有了特征，会产生问题中的 misleading 。
作者: serenashu 时间: 2010-10-19 17:39
情况大概是这样的：
在一个州，每个城&镇都有地方禁烟法规，现在要想通过一个民众签名投票petition搞出个州的禁烟法规，但是工作人员只问群众“Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” ，（并没有明确说明这个是） The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public（新法规的特征）.
问你哪种情况下会让投票者以为这个仅仅是把地方禁烟法规扩充为州的禁烟法规？
BIn rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
把题设最后一句
The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public 新法规的特征产生的条件排出了，断了桥，于是新的法规没有了特征，会产生问题中的 misleading 。
-- by 会员 2010 (2010/10/19 17:01:12)
作者: zinniz 时间: 2010-10-19 19:06
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: 2010 时间: 2010-10-19 19:20
这样想吧：
The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.
这一句讲的是新法规的内容吧，归纳成 新法规的特征 其中一个条件限制是in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public。
那么B中In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public， few表否定，这个时候对rural areas的群众来说，因为周围不存在这个“ 新法规的特征”的条件 retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public，自然无从知道新法规的具体特征，在只被问及“Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?”这个问题的时候，产生新法规等价于 extending the local ordinances statewide的感觉就不奇怪了。 题目问的是，Which of the following circumstances would，可能把自己代入选项的具体环境里想要好想些。
作者: letgooo 时间: 2010-10-19 23:12
B 误导的地方在于：明明这种请愿是无效的，因为农村没啥零售店啥的（但应该有别啥店如餐厅等），却让人觉得这种请愿是很有效很有希望的，因为是问的时候是说整个州都实行（包括了农村所有的地方），所以人们都签名（因为所有地方都被覆盖），这就是误导。反过来想，如果人们都知道请愿只限于农村的零售店，那么很好判断这个请愿貌似没啥用，签的人很可能就没那么多了。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |