ChaseDream

标题: 跪求正解,求英雄 [打印本页]

作者: tangyunjie    时间: 2010-10-15 19:06
标题: 跪求正解,求英雄
Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimesundue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scaledeveloped by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet may collide with Earth.

A.a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihoodthat a particular asteroid or comet may
B.a scale that astronomers have developed rates howlikely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
C.astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likelya particular asteroid or comet will be to
D.astronomers have developed a scale for rating thelikelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
E.astronomers have developed a scale that rates thelikelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may

AB一看就知道错了,CDE中,我觉得likely 这个答案有点危险,随后D和E中我就确定不了了,如果硬上那么选D。一点都没把握,请大家贡献下意见
作者: easy2010    时间: 2010-10-15 19:18
E likelihood 和may 重复
C 比 D 好在effectiveness  to do 表目的好
作者: eshopaholic    时间: 2010-10-15 23:34
C不对吧, asteroid and comet will be to collide with Earth?
作者: easy2010    时间: 2010-10-16 21:27
只是把likely提前了 还原是asteroid and comet will be likely to colide with Earth
作者: jbc88    时间: 2010-10-16 21:48
我觉得是D对。
作者: wangcaroline    时间: 2010-10-16 22:11
GWD原题:GWD-26-Q17。科学家弄了个scale to rate how likely 彗星撞地球,

  →参考观点:responding的主语为人,故排除A+B,D的for doing不如to do简洁,E改主干,C虽然看上去别扭,但是实际上是likely前置带来的阅读困难,放回去则成了“how a particular asteroid and comet will be likely to …”就舒服多啦。
作者: eshopaholic    时间: 2010-10-17 00:07
同意楼上,看多了糊涂了,stupid
作者: jbc88    时间: 2010-10-17 01:23
GWD原题:GWD-26-Q17。科学家弄了个scale to rate how likely 彗星撞地球,

D的for doing不如to do简洁
-- by 会员 wangcaroline (2010/10/16 22:11:41)



还有别的原因能分享下吗?多谢




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3