ChaseDream

标题: 求助一只CR. [打印本页]

作者: dq81    时间: 2010-10-12 17:56
标题: 求助一只CR.
16: GWD-29-Q8 答案是A. BCD明显不对,E也不靠谱,但觉得A也很勉强啊。
要说明环境管制并没有对经济增长起促进作用-我怎么不觉得A是削弱呢?根据题意我只能理解出管制与经济增长没有联系,管制多,教育培训投入多能说明啥?教育培训促进经济,割断了管制对经济增长的关系?可是投钱在教育上就说对经济有促进不是很牵强?
有谁一起讨论下??求点拨!

Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?

According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth.This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth.This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.

    those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training

    even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations

    many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations

    after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth

    even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth


作者: aomeisoft7    时间: 2010-10-12 21:01
引用别人的答案

“问题问的是environmental regulations 没有导致 growth

A 正好说明了growth 不是environmental regulations 带来的,而是invest in education and job training 带来的,只不过这些invest in education and job training的 states 正好是那些有 strictest environmental regulations 的states”
作者: dq81    时间: 2010-10-12 21:58
好吧,还是谢谢你。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3