ChaseDream

标题: OG258请教,谢谢了 [打印本页]

作者: Emma-hi    时间: 2004-4-30 23:49
标题: OG258请教,谢谢了

258. The British sociologist and activist Barbara Wootton once noted as a humorous example of income maldistribution that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning annually exactly what she then earned as director of adult education for London.


(A) that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning


(B) that the elephant, giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo, had been earning


(C) that there was an elephant giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo, and it earned


(D) the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo and was earning(A)


(E) the elephant giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo and that it earned


Choice A, the best answer, uses the idiomatic construction noted... that and clearly focuses on the salient information—a comparison of annual earnings. In B, the structure of noted... that the elephant, giving rides..., had been earning falsely implies that the reader already knows about the elephant—that is, that the existence of this particular elephant is not new information. Also, the past perfect had been improperly places the elephant’s earning in the past, prior to Wootton’s; consistent verb tense is needed to show that the actions are simultaneous. Choice C may be faulted for distortion of meaning and diminished clarity because it suggests that the point of Wootton’s example was the elephant’s very existence; comparative earnings are presented (after and) as incidental detail. Choice D is awkward and inexact; the whole circumstance that Wootton “noted” is best expressed in a clause that begins with that. Choice E does not use the idiomatic construction noted that x; therefore, and that it earned has no parallel construction to which it can be joined.



黑体的OG的解释是什么意思啊,有哪位NN能解释的更明确一些呢?谢谢了


作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-5-2 13:19

1,B的the elephant无限制性修饰成分,the只能特指前面的东西。A有限制性修饰成分that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo ,所以A没有B的问题,A的the可以特指限制性定语从句所表示的对象。

2,A的时态关系是同时,所以B没有理由地更改了时态。

请指正。


作者: Emma-hi    时间: 2004-5-2 19:39
那么和黑体字有什么关系呢?不好意思,不大明白。
作者: caterpillar    时间: 2004-7-2 03:16
再问一下NN们,仍然是这题OG解释中的粗体部分不太懂。A和B的区别除时态外就在于一个用的是定从,一个用的是分词短语。好象这又回到老问题:定从和分词究竟有哪些区别?还有,B里面分词的用法是非限定性的用法,与限定性用法有什么区别呢?
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-2 4:06:37编辑过]

作者: delmar    时间: 2004-7-2 10:12
以下是引用caterpillar在2004-7-2 3:16:00的发言:
再问一下NN们,仍然是这题OG解释中的粗体部分不太懂。A和B的区别除时态外就在于一个用的是定从,一个用的是分词短语。好象这又回到老问题:定从和分词究竟有哪些区别?还有,B里面分词的用法是非限定性的用法,与限定性用法有什么区别呢?


用分词的大象——不是某个公园里(特定的)哪个赚钱多的大象,而是大家知道的任何赚钱那么多的大象


限定定语从句的大象——就是那个公园的那个赚钱多的大象


参考两个星星那题你就明白了


作者: caterpillar    时间: 2004-7-5 21:21
但是OG里的解释好象不是这个意思吧?In B, the structure of noted... that the elephant, giving rides..., had been earning falsely implies that the reader already knows about the elephant—that is, that the existence of this particular elephant is not new information. 这句话是说,B的表达是说人们好象已经知道这只大象的存在,而不是一个新消息了。
作者: hpp920    时间: 2004-8-20 10:35
看见tianwan的回复, 深深的感觉这是个真正的大牛呀!可惜考完就不常来了, 遗憾呀!
作者: rt316    时间: 2004-8-20 11:10
以下是引用hpp920在2004-8-20 10:35:00的发言:
看见tianwan的回复, 深深的感觉这是个真正的大牛呀!可惜考完就不常来了, 遗憾呀!

感慨于hpp920的这番话,其实,你们每个人都将成为牛人,只要你们有恒心和ETS战到底,刻苦钻研是唯一的出路。想起父亲的忠告:靠别人不如靠自己。


作者: joe11    时间: 2004-9-29 23:19

看了上面贴子,怎么对如下还是不清楚。ETS 是想表达用 ,giving rides 短语来修饰 the elephant 时其实表示一惯常已知的事实, 是如此么?

In B, the structure of noted... that the elephant, giving rides..., had been earning falsely implies that the reader already knows about the elephant—that is, that the existence of this particular elephant is not new information.


作者: Pudding    时间: 2004-10-23 20:39

2,A的时态关系是同时,所以B没有理由地更改了时态。

想请问: 我是因为看到后面的句子有个 “then”: what she then earned as director of adult education for London

所以选了B, 因为觉得大象的earning发生在前, and then Barbara的earning发生在后…

为什么说这两个动作是同时发生呢?


作者: stellate    时间: 2004-10-23 21:17
then 除了表示之后,主要是表示“在当时”的和轻微的因果关系:“由此”
作者: Pudding    时间: 2004-10-27 01:22

我懂了而且大象是annually, 所以怎么也不该是一前一后, 呵呵

谢谢stellate JJ~! 妳解答了我好多问题喔…Thank you soooooooo much~!


作者: 小女公子    时间: 2005-4-15 21:33
以下是引用tianwan在2004-5-2 13:19:00的发言:

2,A的时态关系是同时,所以B没有理由地更改了时态。


The British sociologist and activist Barbara Wootton once noted as a humorous example of income maldistribution that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning annually exactly what she then earned as director of adult education for London.

有then了,难道还是simultaneous的呢???

还有,按照白痴语法,annually是不是不能和pefect tense连用?我记得高中有讲……

谢谢


作者: 薰衣紫草    时间: 2005-4-16 09:42

OG71.   The original building and loan associations were organized as limited life funds, whose members made monthly payments on their share subscriptions, then taking turns drawing on the funds for home mortgages.

(A) subscriptions, then taking turns drawing

(B) subscriptions, and then taking turns drawing

(C) subscriptions and then took turns drawing

(D) subscriptions and then took turns, they drewC

(E) subscriptions and then drew, taking turns

The sentence speaks of a sequence of actions in the past: shareholders made their monthly payments and subsequently took turns drawing on the funds. Choice C, the best answer, uses parallel past-tense verb forms to express this sequence. Choices A and B violate parallelism by using taking where took is required. The wording in D results in a run-on sentence and does not specify what the members took turns doing. Similarly, E does not specify what the members drew, and taking turns produces nonsense when combined with the rest of the sentence.


作者: kuang21    时间: 2005-9-11 16:58


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-11 16:59:32编辑过]

作者: milanforever    时间: 2005-12-7 14:35

tianwan的解释太精辟了。


我只能高山仰止,从来没有意识到the和限定/非限定修饰的这种微妙联系。


前辈的高度更激发了我们钻研OG的动力.


作者: coolmanray    时间: 2005-12-10 22:17

个人理解是不是因为大象在过去的一段时间内一直赚那么多钱所以用过去进行时,而she赚钱的动作只是在过去一段时间中的某一更短的时间段,所以用earned?


作者: merben    时间: 2006-2-24 11:08
then adv.

  1. At that time: I was still in school then. Come at noon; I'll be ready then.

作者: cmon    时间: 2006-3-26 00:35



作者: ana9    时间: 2006-10-23 04:55
I think (E) is right if it is changed as "that the elephant giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning..." .   

作者: 西哈克    时间: 2006-10-23 12:36
正是用了then才表示了两个事情是同时发生的,因为then在这里解释为:当时。可以查字典 then的第一条解释就是:at that time

作者: fortitude    时间: 2007-11-7 08:39

up,tianwan


作者: jonathan1987    时间: 2008-8-3 16:41

没有看懂关于b的解释


作者: sync    时间: 2008-8-3 17:13

看了tianwan的解釋,和對then的討論,對這道題茅塞頓開


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-8-3 17:14:52编辑过]

作者: adsdsd    时间: 2016-7-30 12:12
好帖!
Ron的解释没有听懂,在CD果然找到答案了~~
作者: mia7017    时间: 2018-8-16 12:34
感谢分享!               




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3