标题: 这个答案有点绕，求解释~ [打印本页] 作者: frankzhiwei 时间: 2010-9-29 20:39 标题: 这个答案有点绕，求解释~ Smithtown University’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.
Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?
A.Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people. B.This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before. C.This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors. D.The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before. E.More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University ’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
c我也不知道为什么不对，帮顶一下作者: fujianaicd 时间: 2010-9-30 09:57
This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
不知道我这样理解对不对，原文结论是：insufficient effort 而这个选项强调大部分筹到的捐款是没经过怎么努力就筹到了，这并不能说，游说工作不够，也许donation-raisers很努力的找了很多less-likely prospect来捐款，也抽到了一些，所以说不能support这个insufficient effort 的观点。作者: 芷萱85 时间: 2010-9-30 10:03
ls很有道理啊，题干中说good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base，所以评价筹资人的工作就应该以这点作为判断依据。a是说明这点确实没做好的，c和这个无关作者: fiona_stf 时间: 2015-12-17 21:45
整理了以前前几楼的说法：
A“学校的筹资人在面对那些从来没有捐过款的人时，他们的成功率和其他学校的人一样
比较了他们和其他学校对于以前没有捐款的人的成功率 没有解决问题 但可以谈下去
C没有校方的任何联系，以前捐过款的人今年捐了绝大多数的钱。
讲的是今年大部分钱来自于哪里，无法说明校方的努力程度。可能小部分钱是校方非常努力筹来的
选A