ChaseDream

标题: 求教大全B-18,没有搜索到 [打印本页]

作者: cindysuger    时间: 2010-9-26 17:16
标题: 求教大全B-18,没有搜索到
18.    It’s time we stopped searching for new statistics to suggest that we are not spending enough on education. In fact, education spending increased 30 percent overall during the last decade.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Despite increased spending on education, enrollment in our elementary and secondary schools declined about 4 percent during the last ten years.
(B) Our spending on gasoline increased more than 100 percent during the last decade.
(C) When adjusted for inflation, our per-pupil expenditure on education this year is less than it was ten years ago.
(D) Eleven other economically developed nations spend more on education than we do.
(E) The achievement levels of our students have been declining steadily since 1960, and the last decade produced no reversal in this trend.
这个题是什么意思,我觉得e,d都说的有道理。正确答案是c
作者: 芷萱85    时间: 2010-9-26 18:07
现在我们不必再去寻找那些支持我们在教育投入不够的统计数据了,事实上,在过去的10年中我们在教育上的投入上升了30%

问削弱



A 尽管我们在教育上的投入增加,但是我们的学校的入学人数却在过去的10年中下降了4%

B 我们在燃料上的开销增加了100%以上

C 如果考虑通货膨胀的话,我们在每个小学生身上的投入相比于10年前其实下降了

D 11个别的经济发达国家比我们在教育上投入更过

E 我们学生的成就从1960开始就逐渐的下滑,而过去的十年这个确实并没有任何的变化

搜着前人说的了,我就不单写了,直接贴

题目的逻辑是: 因为 我们在教育上的投入上升了30% 所以我们在教育上没有足够投入的判断是不对的

C很鲜明的削弱了这个观点,尽管我们投入上升了 30% 但是考虑到通胀,我们对于每个小学生的投入实际上是下降了




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3