ChaseDream

标题: 我真的搞不懂OG这些都是怎么看出来的??? [打印本页]

作者: xiaoguolulu    时间: 2010-9-21 12:55
标题: 我真的搞不懂OG这些都是怎么看出来的???
OG12-26:
Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington "Dickinson were  written over a period begining a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering" her letters to anyone else.

A.Dickinson were  written over a period begining a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering

E.Dickinson, which were  written over a period begining a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber

正解是E。OG说,这个句子的主要意思是要强调Dickinson's letters to her sister-in-law outnumber her letters to anyonelse.所以outnumber是主要动词。可是我一开始做这题的时候真的看不出来这句子是要强调outnumber啊,我觉得outnumbering作为定语来修饰letters也很合适啊。请教NN,怎么能一眼就看出句子的强调部分在哪里???
作者: jbc88    时间: 2010-9-21 14:01
outnumbering在这里,既不能表示伴随结果也不能表示动作的伴随。
所以不妥。

建议少看og解释,naive speaker和我们是不一样的。

加油~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3