标题: gwd 逻辑 [打印本页] 作者: dpzixuan89 时间: 2010-9-18 13:14 标题: gwd 逻辑 Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage.However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods.For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain.Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking.However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.
many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life
it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has
cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded
自己知道应该选E，但不知道为什么选E
作者: frankzhiwei 时间: 2010-9-18 15:48
irradiation的效果=cook，那么，不是全部都是生吃的呀，还得cook，那不就double destroy 营养了。 这题就想OG那题电视广告cable TV说，“free TV”并不是free，而其实是要客户帮忙给了广告的费用，可是如果cable TV也有广告的话，那岂不就还得给个double！作者: aomeisoft7 时间: 2010-9-19 09:03
for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded B1损失量=irradiated损失的B1+cooked损失的B1