Questions 100
Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence, Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.
Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist, Dr. Ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.
100. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson’s argument?
(A) Dr. Ladlow’s evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze is inaccurate.
(B) Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disproved.
(C) No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explanations.
(D) Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a maze.
(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.
正确的解为(B) 想请教(E)选项为何不佳 ?
我思考的点 : (B)为整个题干的浓缩 (E)则为最后一句话的改写
两者似乎都不佳 ?1
E是直接事实，不用infer了；infer题不像阅读中的直接事实题，找一个跟原文一模一样的就OK；infer题需要在原文的基础上作一些变换。
B用了三重否定；把Anson 的几句话连接成一句话。 这就是infer.
呼呼 ~~ 谢谢版主
解释的好清楚 ^ ^ 3Q 3Q
深刻感受到拨云见月的快乐 呵呵
哇 !!!!!!!! 逻..辑...不.... 太好 !!!????
謝謝你用力重創我脆弱的心靈 !!!!
嗚嗚嗚 .....
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |