ChaseDream

标题: 谁帮我解释解释逻辑狗狗85题? [打印本页]

作者: chenyujing    时间: 2010-9-9 19:18
标题: 谁帮我解释解释逻辑狗狗85题?
Radio stations with radio data system (RDS) technology broadcast special program information that only radios with an RDS feature can receive. Between 1994 and 1996, the number of RDS radio stations in Verdland increased from 250 to 600. However, since the number of RDS-equipped radios in Verdland was about the same in 1996 as in 1994, the number of Verlanders receiving the special program information probably did not increase significantly.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. few if any of the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994 broadcast to people with RDS-equipped radios living in areas not previously reached by RDS stations.

B. In 1996 most Verdlanders who lived within the listening area of an RDS station already had a radio equipped to receive RDS.

C. Equipping a radio station with RDS technology does not decrease the stationâ?s listening area.

D. In 1996 Verlanders who did not own radios equipped to receive RDS could not receive any programming from the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994.

E. The RDS radio stations in Verdland in 1996 did not all offer the same type of programming.

答案是A
怎么不选D?

作者: chenyujing    时间: 2010-9-9 19:19

作者: chris5105077    时间: 2010-9-9 19:55
station数量增加
但可以接受信号的radio没增加
推出 收到的RDS信号的人没增加

Asumption  之前很少有RDS RADIO的人住在STATION没覆盖的区域

如果是,增强,
取非,结论不成立
作者: chris5105077    时间: 2010-9-9 19:57
D只是重复了上面的话,就是只有 RDS设备的RAdio才能听到RDS信号的广播
作者: zinniz    时间: 2010-9-9 19:58
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: chenyujing    时间: 2010-9-9 20:28
station数量增加
但可以接受信号的radio没增加
推出 收到的RDS信号的人没增加

Asumption  之前很少有RDS RADIO的人住在STATION没覆盖的区域

如果是,增强,
取非,结论不成立、

soga!THS!
-- by 会员 chris5105077 (2010/9/9 19:55:23)


作者: chenyujing    时间: 2010-9-9 20:30
我也不明白,同问。。

LS的解释我也没看明白,囧。。。就我这水平估计得再战了。。。
-- by 会员 zinniz (2010/9/9 19:58:16)



就是说如果以前有人住在覆盖不了的地区,那收听的人就小于拥有那个设备的人,如果那些人都搬到能覆盖的地区了,收听的人就会增加!
作者: forevergter    时间: 2010-9-9 22:28
d是把整个讨论的大前提   不是作者的逻辑assume的
作者: 为何你我他    时间: 2017-11-25 21:54
我:
嗯,理解你的意思。 但是你看假设你取非以后,他能从别的地方听到RDS节目的话。 那么题目的the number of V 能听到RDS 节目的人 不就增加了嘛
我:
这个就没有削弱到结论。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3