ChaseDream

标题: 帮着补逻辑狗狗！~ [打印本页]

作者: aary431 时间: 2010-9-9 18:36
标题: 帮着补逻辑狗狗！~
自己估计没有办法在GMAT里考到什么高分贡献JJ额...但是还是要为CD做贡献啊，那道缺的ON LAND UNDER SEA的逻辑狗可能不是GWD而是老PREP1里的：

Most of the world's supply of uranium currently comes from mines. It is possible to extract uranium from seawater, but the cost of doing so is greater than the price that uranium fetches on the world market. Therefore, until the cost of extracting uranium from seawater can somehow be reduced, this method of obtaining uranium is unlikely to be commercially viable.

Which of the following would it be most useful to determine in evaluating the argument?

(A) Whether the uranium in deposits on land is rapidly being depleted

(B) Whether most uranium is used near where it is mined

(C) Whether there are any technological advances that show promise of reducing the cost of extracting uranium from seawater

(D) Whether the total amount of uranium in seawater is significantly greater than the total amount of uranium on land

(E) Whether uranium can be extracted from freshwater at a cost similar to the cost of extracting it from seawater
希望造福大家啊！~

作者: G_will 时间: 2010-9-9 19:00
谢谢LZ。

保佑俺考上700吧！！！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)