ChaseDream

标题: og-86 解答下WITH的问题 [打印本页]

作者: jianhu8246    时间: 2010-9-1 06:57
标题: og-86 解答下WITH的问题
86. The results of the company’s cost-cutting measures
are evident in its profi ts, which increased 5 percent
during the fi rst 3 months of this year after it fell over
the last two years.
(A) which increased 5 percent during the fi rst
3 months of this year after it fell
(B) which had increased 5 percent during the fi rst
3 months of this year after it had fallen
(C) which have increased 5 percent during the fi rst
3 months of this year after falling
(D) with a 5 percent increase during the fi rst
3 months of this year after falling
(E) with a 5 percent increase during the fi rst
3 months of this year after having fallen

C 和D  对比 D为什么WITH不行呢 看OG的解释觉得不是很明白!!NN出来给菜鸟解答下
作者: jianhu8246    时间: 2010-9-1 07:04
OG的解释说 WITH修饰的对象有问题, 我想问 TIWH 到底是怎么修饰前面的对象的 是像 WHICH一样只修饰最近的一个 还是想ING形式的 可以跳跃修饰主语 或整个句子  那在什么情况下 WITH才不会产生这种修饰对象不清的情况呢 请解答一下 非常感谢!!!!!!
作者: sophia000    时间: 2010-9-1 09:09
我认为with的范围比较大,不太能明确它到底是with的之前的那件事,而后面的句子非常明确的是在修饰profits,这里用which比with要明确。个人感觉og的解释中很强调修饰的明确性,即能够使用更确切的修饰方法时,就不要选择囊括性大的,这点符合gmat所说的高效简洁的表达




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3