ChaseDream

标题: gwd29-8. 这也是个争议题吗？？？？ [打印本页]

作者: gmgmwll 时间: 2010-8-29 23:05
标题: gwd29-8. 这也是个争议题吗？？？？
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?

According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth.This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth.This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.

those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth

答案给的是A,但我觉得投资什么并没有说明regulation和growth的关系，相反我觉得e很好的说明了。
法规弱的地方的经济增长不比法规强的地方的经济增长低，不就说明了法规强会促进经济增长了吗？？？

看到gwd有那么多的争议题，真是怀疑还做不做他了。。。。。

作者: judydongxueni 时间: 2010-8-30 07:08
这个题目没有争议

a是正确的。投资和教育投入多，说明经济增长不是由于环保投入促进的

e不正确，题干讲的是是不是管治越多就经济越好，而不是是不是有管治经济就不好，是一个线性的问题不是一个是非的问题

作者: gmgmwll 时间: 2010-8-30 08:05
奥，也就是说他说的是法规和经济增长的关系跟法规弱不弱没有关系对吗？？

作者: judydongxueni 时间: 2010-8-30 08:18
基本上是这个意思吧

作者: shirly813 时间: 2010-8-30 14:53
其实我想只要理解了“This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however,…” 实际上的意思是” However, this fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth” 问题就迎刃而解了

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)