ChaseDream

标题: 18. GWD25-Q18 [打印本页]

作者: fly12404    时间: 2010-8-28 15:42
标题: 18. GWD25-Q18
18. GWD25-Q18

Incontrast toenvironmentalists proposals to limit emissionsof certain pollutants,the administration proposed calling for mandatory restrictions of onlythree such pollutantsfrom power plants-mercury, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides and the plan would delay such cutsuntil 2010 or later.

A.   administration proposedcalling for mandatory restriction of

B.   administration proposeda call for mandatory restrictions, including those for

C.   administration, proposingmandatory restrictions on

D.   administration’s proposal was a call for mandatory restrictions, which include  

E.    administration’s proposal would call formandatory restrictions on

答案我了解

但對於句子結構存疑

Incontrast toenvironmentalists proposals to limit emissionsof certain pollutants,the administration proposed calling for mandatory restrictions of onlythree such pollutantsfrom power plants-mercury, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides (((and the plan would delay such cutsuntil 2010 or later.)))

and the plan would...唯一獨立句子

與前句連接為何不加逗號呢? 變成..

Incontrast toenvironmentalists proposals to limit emissionsof certain pollutants,the administration proposed calling for mandatory restrictions of onlythree such pollutantsfrom power plants-mercury, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides " , "and the plan would delay such cutsuntil 2010 or later.



感謝回答

作者: fly12404    时间: 2010-8-28 18:52
ding
作者: elvis0214    时间: 2010-10-4 22:46
同问。。。
作者: mengcherry0410    时间: 2011-2-13 20:03
D为什么不对呢?
作者: 毛毛carina    时间: 2011-2-13 21:28
平行的角度很容易排除A,B,C

剩下D,E

1,动词优先于名词,所以would call 就比was a call 好
2,D选项which指代 restrictions,那这句话的意思就变成了restrictions 包括三种污染,逻辑不对。
作者: 灰灰糖    时间: 2011-5-8 21:14
ABC如果是因为平行结构不对排除的话 那是不是意思就是题目错了 前面应该是environmentalists' proposals?
作者: yangmars    时间: 2011-5-10 16:49
没有人觉得 environments proposals 有问题吗?这样子的话主语不会混乱吗?应该是environment's proposals才合理啊?为什么两个并列的名词可以这样子放的?
作者: 像风一样离去    时间: 2011-5-16 13:26
对于楼上的意见我表示同意。
作者: wtylys    时间: 2011-8-13 21:34
我也是这样觉得的,有谁解释一下否?
作者: kjia0120    时间: 2012-7-23 14:12
ABC如果是因为平行结构不对排除的话 那是不是意思就是题目错了 前面应该是environmentalists' proposals?
-- by 会员 灰灰糖 (2011/5/8 21:14:25)


我也是看了好久看不出个头绪
估计是原题写错了




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3