Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states. A. was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it B. was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally C. was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally D. has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so E. has never been applied, Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so作者: alicejingli 时间: 2010-8-26 12:05
？没人。。。作者: alicejingli 时间: 2010-8-28 21:46
没有人？作者: TicTacc 时间: 2010-8-29 10:04
我也不是很知道whereby的高深用法，只知道whereby 相当于by which。所以，如果用了whereby,选了C,D的话，整个句子就没有主句了。作者: alicejingli 时间: 2010-8-29 14:14
oh,有道理，那是不是就是说相当于BY WHICH ，也就是定语丛句作者: caiqiunan 时间: 2012-3-12 19:26
啊～菜鸟表示还是不懂啊。能不能讲详细点啊亲…求高手解救