ChaseDream

标题: 求助一道OG的逻辑题~ [打印本页]

作者: 陌下清风    时间: 2010-8-18 12:39
标题: 求助一道OG的逻辑题~
  The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method
  called "historical costing." Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based
  on the current rate of inflation, to the previous year's contractual price.
  Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing
  method for military contracts?
(A) The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.
(B) The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past 20 years.
(C) The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the products.
(D) Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military contracts.
(E) The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of innovation weapons.

这道题的答案为A,但我从头到尾就没明白他想讲什么....好心人救救我吧,谢谢啦~
作者: bijinjing    时间: 2010-8-18 16:10
如果过去的价格是不有效,而政府支付方式为过去价格+通货膨胀的调整价,等于现在继续要支付不有效价格
作者: Titlis    时间: 2010-8-18 16:12
问的是 the best
作者: 陌下清风    时间: 2010-8-19 13:58
没太看懂....那B选项为什么不能选呢?有关通货膨胀率的问题~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3