ChaseDream

标题: 一道JJ讨论 [打印本页]

作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-4-22 12:03
标题: 一道JJ讨论

2.
Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.

Pat:  No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it (nlhsz提供)

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change.
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
D.by pointing to the absence of negative effects simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group.


我选A,标准答案是什么?


作者: mariezhu    时间: 2004-4-22 15:56
我也选A
作者: snow_mountain    时间: 2004-4-22 17:12
attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely
D.by pointing to the absence of negative effects simply denies
作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-4-22 18:43

bryony:应该是A,P只说了现在的judge中有别的收入的人少,但M所指的是现在不是judge但有可能成为judge的人,所以P答非所问。


作者: 番茄炒蛋    时间: 2004-4-23 10:37

?这题以前不是讨论过的吗,答案上次我也给过解释啊,呵呵,好像有不少斑竹都统一过答案

A


作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-4-23 20:27
可问题是搜索不到,炒蛋兄能提供链接吗?在哪儿?
作者: 番茄炒蛋    时间: 2004-4-23 20:59

啊,这个我就记得不是很清楚了,但我很清楚的记得我给出过解释和例子

不过只要你看懂了就行了啊,没必要太深究了,机井和真题还是有一定差距的,理解里面的逻辑关系才是最重要的

ps,当时里面好像也有人选d,但我没有仔细看理由

当时草莓好像也进去确认过的,不行的话你再呼一下他吧


作者: cranberry    时间: 2004-4-23 22:43
是A,因为现在法官中的情况不能说明对别的人的影响,比如,教授,大律师等等




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3