Situation: For five years the Souper restaurant chain has maintained rapid sales growth in Danport, primarily by opening new restaurants that draw patrons away from other restaurants in their vicinity.
Goal: Souper wishes to achieve continued rapid sales growth in Danport over the next two years.
Proposal for consideration: Continue to open new restaurants in Danport during the next two years at the same rate as in the last two years.
In light of the situation, which of the following, if true, most strongly argues that adopting the proposal would be an ineffective way of achieving the goal?
(A) At times at which customers find Souper restaurants too crowded, they often go to other restaurants nearby.
(B) The Souper chain has generally opened new restaurants in locations that are in the vicinity of a large number of other restaurants.
(C) Souper restaurants generally offer a much smaller variety of foods than many of the other restaurants in their vicinity.
(D) Virtually all potential sites for new Souper restaurants in Danport are located in the vicinity of existing Souper restaurants.
(E) Souper restaurants have always offered meals that are somewhat less expensive than meals at restaurants that compete with Souper for patrons. 作者: cartier921 时间: 2010-8-12 14:27
大家快来看看吧。。作者: 小球藻 时间: 2010-8-12 14:36
D 原文说一直开新餐馆，把附近餐馆生意抢过来了。为了保持增长速度，应该继续开餐馆。 但是如果说已有餐馆已经覆盖了这个城市，没有什么空间去抢其他餐馆生意，那就是削弱了作者: 小球藻 时间: 2010-8-12 14:37
A和B是加强，A说太拥挤了会换个餐馆，那再开新餐馆可以分流。 B说附近还有很多其他餐馆，那还可以继续抢生意 CE都是无关比较作者: cartier921 时间: 2010-8-12 14:46
Proposal for consideration: Continue to open new restaurants in Danport during the next two years at the same rate as in the last two years. 这句话是什么意思啊？作者: 小球藻 时间: 2010-8-12 14:51
提议：未来两年以过去两年的速度继续在d地区开新的餐馆作者: cartier921 时间: 2010-8-12 14:55
终于搞明白了！谢谢欧
