标题: 再问大全268（补充204）they指代不清问题 [打印本页] 作者: ozymendias 时间: 2010-8-12 11:43 标题: 再问大全268（补充204）they指代不清问题 204. During the recession of 1973, home mortgage foreclosures resulted in tens of thousands of Americans being evicted from homes that they can no longer afford monthly payments. (A) that they can (B) that they could (C) on which they can (D) because they can (E) for which they could 看过前人的帖子，关于D错误的解释有两个can应该为could，they指代不清。 可为什么they会有指代不清之嫌呢？我认为根据逻辑意思they can no longer afford monthly payments中的they只能指代Americans，home mortgage foreclosures 是不可能发出afford这个动作的啊？求解释作者: ozymendias 时间: 2010-8-13 11:19
顶一下作者: fanfanwill 时间: 2010-9-17 02:20
foreclosure是抵押品赎回权的意思，我认为若是要指代它，则应用those指代物，而不是用they这样的人称代词。所以可以忽略they存在they指代不明的问题。作者: jbc88 时间: 2010-9-17 09:53
they可以指代物的。我觉得they并没有指代不清。 主要还是could的原因。作者: ozymendias 时间: 2010-9-22 09:51
恩，谢谢楼上和楼上上