ChaseDream

标题: [求助]大全978题 [打印本页]
作者: freedownload    时间: 2004-4-22 01:28
标题: [求助]大全978题

1.        Tektites, which may have been propelled to Earth from lunar volcanoes, are much like the volcanic glass obsidian, but their chemical composition is different than any terrestrial lava; they contain far less water than obsidian does and none of its characteristic microcrystals.


(A) is different than any terrestrial lava; they contain


(B) is different than any terrestrial lava’s, containing


(C) is different from that of any terrestrial lava; they contain


(D) differs from any terrestrial lava in containing（C）


(E) differs from that of any terrestrial lava’s, containing


E是不是错在that of any terrestrial lava’s中的's？


如果改成that of any terrestrial lava，对吗？这时候后面这个containning的逻辑主语是Tektites，还是terrestrial lava？


另外，C中的they应该优先指代前面句子的主语，是吗？那就是Tektites，可是意思上不是的，那算明确吗？


谢谢！

作者: newyork_999    时间: 2004-5-18 16:36

顶！我也有同样的问题。

they contain 和后面的its也不对应

作者: ios    时间: 2004-5-18 19:34

its 指obsidian

Ther指Tektites

作者: LES    时间: 2004-5-18 19:42
以下是引用freedownload在2004-4-22 1:28:00的发言：

E是不是错在that of any terrestrial lava’s中的's？


－是的，any terrestrial lava's的什么呢？既's后面没有可补全的内容了，在此是多余的。


如果改成that of any terrestrial lava，对吗？这时候后面这个containning的逻辑主语是Tektites，还是terrestrial lava？


－偶觉得不好，这样会造成containning修饰对象的歧义。


另外，C中的they应该优先指代前面句子的主语，是吗？那就是Tektites，可是意思上不是的，那算明确吗？


－they指tektites，its指obsidian。


谢谢！



作者: wzhyan    时间: 2005-11-27 19:22

那本题中的最后的 none of its characteristic microcrystals. 是什么意思

作者: Dinaxie    时间: 2006-7-10 20:59

这个句子有些跳跃，第一反映就是继续讲chemical composition

but their chemical composition  is different from that of any terrestrial lava; they contain far less water than obsidian does and none of its characteristic microcrystals.

请问：and none of its characteristic microcrystals 和哪部分并列？


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-10 21:03:22编辑过]
作者: qwedcxzas    时间: 2007-12-27 10:12

虽然ls可能不会看到了

我还是说说我的看法

they contain far less water than obsidian does and (they contain) none of its characteristic microcrystals

T的水含量比o少,且不包含o的characteristic microcrystals

有错请指正~

作者: szy733    时间: 2009-2-23 11:24
up
作者: Amber1991    时间: 2012-10-4 23:22
everybody help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!走过路过不要错过，小妹想问正确答案是c，我一开始认为分号后面的they会造成指代不明的情况，但是仔细发现是分号，所以前后应该是并列，所以主语they也就明确地指代了前一句子的主语tektites，不存在指代不明确的情况。
而如果将标点改成逗号，后面加上and they就会出现指代不明确了，不知道我的想法对不对，求nn答疑！
作者: DUKB24    时间: 2012-10-5 00:12
everybody help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!走过路过不要错过，小妹想问正确答案是c，我一开始认为分号后面的they会造成指代不明的情况，但是仔细发现是分号，所以前后应该是并列，所以主语they也就明确地指代了前一句子的主语tektites，不存在指代不明确的情况。
而如果将标点改成逗号，后面加上and they就会出现指代不明确了，不知道我的想法对不对，求nn答疑！
-- by 会员 Amber1991 (2012/10/4 23:22:31)




you cannot eliminate semicolon and change it into comma +and


comma+and is used when two separate and independent sentences are written ；semicolon is used to describe two related sentences


but here the latter part is an further description for the former part（you should read the sentence carefully）


also， according to the preferred rule stated in Manhattan， pronoun ambiguity is not an issue here


they will be pointed to the subject of the preceding clause （because of the same grammatical  role）
作者: Amber1991    时间: 2012-10-5 00:22
everybody help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!走过路过不要错过，小妹想问正确答案是c，我一开始认为分号后面的they会造成指代不明的情况，但是仔细发现是分号，所以前后应该是并列，所以主语they也就明确地指代了前一句子的主语tektites，不存在指代不明确的情况。
而如果将标点改成逗号，后面加上and they就会出现指代不明确了，不知道我的想法对不对，求nn答疑！
-- by 会员 Amber1991 (2012/10/4 23:22:31)





you cannot eliminate semicolon and change it into comma +and


comma+and is used when two separate and independent sentences are written ；semicolon is used to describe two related sentences


but here the latter part is an further description for the former part（you should read the sentence carefully）


also， according to the preferred rule stated in Manhattan， pronoun ambiguity is not an issue here


they will be pointed to the subject of the preceding clause （because of the same grammatical  role）
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/5 0:12:22)



谢谢！解答了我的问题之外也指出我的另外一个问题，太感谢啦！
虽然这个句子不可一这样改，但如果是这样的情况，就是，and they ，那they 还是“ will be pointed to the subject of the preceding clause”的吧？
所以说，这道题根本就不存在指代不明的问题嘛？
作者: DUKB24    时间: 2012-10-5 00:25
everybody help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!走过路过不要错过，小妹想问正确答案是c，我一开始认为分号后面的they会造成指代不明的情况，但是仔细发现是分号，所以前后应该是并列，所以主语they也就明确地指代了前一句子的主语tektites，不存在指代不明确的情况。
而如果将标点改成逗号，后面加上and they就会出现指代不明确了，不知道我的想法对不对，求nn答疑！
-- by 会员 Amber1991 (2012/10/4 23:22:31)






you cannot eliminate semicolon and change it into comma +and


comma+and is used when two separate and independent sentences are written ；semicolon is used to describe two related sentences


but here the latter part is an further description for the former part（you should read the sentence carefully）


also， according to the preferred rule stated in Manhattan， pronoun ambiguity is not an issue here


they will be pointed to the subject of the preceding clause （because of the same grammatical  role）
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/5 0:12:22)




谢谢！解答了我的问题之外也指出我的另外一个问题，太感谢啦！
虽然这个句子不可一这样改，但如果是这样的情况，就是，and they ，那they 还是“ will be pointed to the subject of the preceding clause”的吧？
所以说，这道题根本就不存在指代不明的问题嘛？
-- by 会员 Amber1991 (2012/10/5 0:22:18)



yes， no ambiguous here



欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3