标题: 【HELP】GWD25-Q3.---帖子看了好多好多。。。都没有我问的。。。 [打印本页] 作者: fannybeibei 时间: 2010-8-5 21:59 标题: 【HELP】GWD25-Q3.---帖子看了好多好多。。。都没有我问的。。。 Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements. Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.
Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it
A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members. B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group.
但是我一开始选了C。。。有谁能告诉我为什么C是错的啊作者: doreen125 时间: 2010-8-6 08:28
我觉得B是因果倒置的意思咯~ 我一开始选的也是C，现在觉得C确实描述的是Pat的话，但是C没有表现出inadequate吧~作者: fannybeibei 时间: 2010-8-6 11:17
thanks, try to answer c,pls correct me if i am wrong attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects
IMO, changes refer to a raise in salary while the absence of negative effects refers to the effects of a ban