标题: 求教 GWD-03-new (XY02) Q16 - 实在是困惑 [打印本页] 作者: CharS 时间: 2010-8-5 15:29 标题: 求教 GWD-03-new (XY02) Q16 - 实在是困惑 Q16: Economist: Tropicorp,which constantly seeks profitable investment opportunities, has been buying andclearing sections of tropical forest for cattle ranching, although pasturesnewly created there become useless for grazing after just a few years. The company has not gone into rubber tapping,even though greater profits can be madefrom rubber tapping, which leaves the forest intact. Thus, some environmentalists conclude that Tropicorp has not acted wholly out of economicself-interest. However, theseenvironmentalists are probably wrong. The initial investment required for a successful rubber-tappingoperation is larger than that needed for a cattle ranch. Furthermore, there is a shortage of workersemployable in rubber-tapping operations, and finally, taxes are higher onprofits from rubber tapping than on profits from cattle ranching.
In the economist’s argument, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
The first supports the conclusion of the economist’s argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
The first states the conclusion of the economist’s argument; the second supports that conclusion.
The first supports the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second states that conclusion.
The first states the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second states the conclusion of the economist’s argument.
Each supports the conclusion of the economist’s argument.
答案为什么是C呢？？2nd boldface 是 conclusion???
还想请教各位牛人，做BF题有什么技巧吗？我是做一题错一题啊，挫败感严重！！
谢谢了！！作者: samt2w 时间: 2010-8-5 20:34
请楼主完整地看一下2nd boldfaced这句Thus, some environmentalists conclude that Tropicorp has not acted wholly out of economicself-interest. 里面已经写着conclude这个词了，所以这是个conclusion是没什么疑问的。我猜测楼主是对选项3里面that conclusion的指代有疑惑，此处是指enviromentalist的conclusion，而不是economist的。作者: joyce22 时间: 2010-8-18 12:04
UP一下~ 刚好这里也有困惑
