标题: GWD-29-Q37, GWD-29-Q35多谢 [打印本页] 作者: ypl214 时间: 2010-7-31 11:20 标题: GWD-29-Q37, GWD-29-Q35多谢 In Patton City, days are categorized as having heavy rainfall (more than two inches), moderate rainfall (more than one inch, but no more than two inches), light rainfall (at least a trace, but no more than one inch), or no rainfall.In 1990, there were fewer days with light rainfall than in 1910 and fewer with moderate rainfall, yet total rainfall for the year was 20 percent higher in 1990 than in 1910.
If the statements above are true, then it is also possible that in Patton City
A.the number of days with heavy rainfall was lower in 1990 than in 1910
B.the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was the same in 1990 as in 1910
C.the number of days with some rainfall, but no more than two inches, was higher in 1990 than in 1910
D.the total number of inches of rain that fell on days with moderate rainfall in 1990 was more than twice what it had been in 1910
E.the average amount of rainfall per month was lower in 1990 than in 1910 我认为没一个对的 Rabbits were introduced to Numa Island in the nineteenth century.Overgrazing by the enormous population of rabbits now menaces the island’s agriculture.The government proposes to reduce the population by using a virus that has caused devastating epidemics in rabbit populations elsewhere.There is, however, a chance that the virus will infect the bilby, an endangered native marsupial.The government’s plan, therefore, may serve the interests of agriculture but will clearly increase the threat to native wildlife.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A.There is less chance that the virus will infect domestic animals on Numa than that it will infect bilbies.
B.There are no species of animals on the island that prey on the rabbits.
C.Overgrazing by rabbits endangers many of the plants on which bilbies feed.（我觉着没关系啊） D.The virus that the government proposes to use has been successfully used elsewhere to control populations of rabbits.
E.There is no alternative means of reducing the rabbit population that would involve no threat to the bilby.
Rabbits were introduced to Numa Island in the nineteenth century.Overgrazing by the enormous population of rabbits now menaces the island’s agriculture.The government proposes to reduce the population by using a virus that has caused devastating epidemics in rabbit populations elsewhere.There is, however, a chance that the virus will infect the bilby, an endangered native marsupial.The government’s plan, therefore, may serve the interests of agriculture but will clearly increase the threat to native wildlife. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A.There is less chance that the virus will infect domestic animals on Numa than that it will infect bilbies.
B.There are no species of animals on the island that prey on the rabbits.
C.Overgrazing by rabbits endangers many of the plants on which bilbies feed.（我觉着没关系啊） D.The virus that the government proposes to use has been successfully used elsewhere to control populations of rabbits.
E.There is no alternative means of reducing the rabbit population that would involve no threat to the bilby. 作者: 2008115061 时间: 2010-7-31 12:56
第一题建议你直接google一下 有XDF的讲解。 第二题我自己的想法：我认为削弱的argument 是“will clearly increase the threat to native wildlife”。 作者认为virus will infect B--->对B有害，但忽略了这种病毒对B的好处，就是会消灭兔子（兔子从一种方面来说是天敌，因为会吃掉草）作者: tanyawu 时间: 2010-7-31 13:28
GWD-29-Q37选A.
细看该题所问“If the statements above are true, then it is also possible that in Patton City”，原来并非是由原文推出选项的导出题，而是一道怪题；只要是“可能的”项就是正确的。换句话说，依据原文，有四个选项是绝不可能的，只有一个是可能的。