ChaseDream

标题: 请教OG12-65 [打印本页]

作者: 刷牙不起沫 时间: 2010-7-30 14:07
标题: 请教OG12-65
65.   Excavation of the ancient city of Kourion on the island
of Cyprus revealed a pattern of debris and collapsed
buildings typical of towns devastated by earthquakes.
Archaeologists have hypothesized that the destruction
was due to a major earthquake known to have
occurred near the island in A.D. 365.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports
the archaeologists' hypothesis?
(A)   Bronze ceremonial drinking vessels that are
often found in graves dating from years
preceding and following A.D. 365 were also
found in several graves near Kourion.
(B)   No coins minted after A.D. 365 were found in
Kourion, but coins minted before that year were
found in abundance.
(C)   Most modern histories of Cyprus mention that
an earthquake occurred near the island in
A.D. 365.
(D)   Several small statues carved in styles current in
Cyprus in the century between A.D. 300 and
A.D. 400 were found in Kourion.
(E)   Stone inscriptions in a form of the Greek
alphabet that was definitely used in Cyprus after
A.D. 365 were found in Kourion.

答案是B，解释为 Which statement best supports the archaeologists' hypothesis? An earthquake struck near
Cyprus in A.D. 365; this fact is not disputed. If this earthquake is the one responsible for
the devastation of Kourion, then there should be evidence of active occupation before
A.D. 365, but no evidence of activity after that date. The dates on the coins found on the
site suggest that life in Kourion was flourishing before A.D. 365; the total lack of coins
after the year of the earthquake supports the idea that the city had been destroyed.
但我觉得C也算一种加强啊，因为它证明了确实有地震发生，而原文中没有说当时真的发生了地震。而B说了地震前后的区别，但这种区别就没有可能是别的灾难造成的吗？还有D说削弱了结论，是因为statues发现于A.D.300-400间算是一种证明，而若在365-400就没法证明了吗？
我彻底晕了，望大家各抒己见~

作者: 刷牙不起沫 时间: 2010-7-30 22:26
自己顶

作者: sugaryun 时间: 2010-7-31 00:14
原文中说了“due to a major earthquake known to have occurred near the island in A.D. 365.” 正如OG的解释this fact is not disputed 发生地震这是事实。你在做逻辑题的时候不要加进自己的想象，原题说是真的，那么就当作真的处理。C可排除。

加强题的本质是增加结论成立的概率。正确选项可以不具有充分性也可以不具有必要性。
原文的结论是什么？结论是地震毁灭了古城。再看选项B，说公元365年（也就是发生地震这年）之后考古就没有发现过硬币，而这之前发现了很多。那么说明地震造成了古城生产活动的终止。事实与结论匹配。

D选项公元300-400这个区间和公元365年发生地震这个条件没有关系，故可排除。

做加强型题要带着结论看选项。

作者: xeniav 时间: 2010-8-1 12:44
我是觉得寻找论据进一步支持论点就好了。C好像是对论点的重复，还是没有说明凭什么说古城毁灭是地震造成的。

作者: 刷牙不起沫 时间: 2010-8-1 22:10

原文中说了“due to a major earthquake known to have occurred near the island in A.D. 365.” 正如OG的解释this fact is not disputed 发生地震这是事实。你在做逻辑题的时候不要加进自己的想象，原题说是真的，那么就当作真的处理。C可排除。

加强题的本质是增加结论成立的概率。正确选项可以不具有充分性也可以不具有必要性。
原文的结论是什么？结论是地震毁灭了古城。再看选项B，说公元365年（也就是发生地震这年）之后考古就没有发现过硬币，而这之前发现了很多。那么说明地震造成了古城生产活动的终止。事实与结论匹配。

D选项公元300-400这个区间和公元365年发生地震这个条件没有关系，故可排除。

做加强型题要带着结论看选项。

-- by 会员 sugaryun (2010/7/31 0:14:32)

我明白了~似乎太钻牛角尖了，把自己绕晕了。谢谢解答~

作者: 刷牙不起沫 时间: 2010-8-1 22:11

我是觉得寻找论据进一步支持论点就好了。C好像是对论点的重复，还是没有说明凭什么说古城毁灭是地震造成的。

-- by 会员 xeniav (2010/8/1 12:44:25)

确实是！谢谢指点迷津！

作者: xibao 时间: 2011-3-25 01:07
为什么365年以后这个城就不能重新新建啊？？？？？？？？？

作者: Dianakisscat 时间: 2011-3-25 15:15

为什么365年以后这个城就不能重新新建啊？？？？？？？？？

-- by 会员 xibao (2011/3/25 1:07:44)

这就需要一个常识的问题···
我刚做这个题和LS有同样的错误

请类比庞贝的火山喷发。
一次埋，永久埋。
所以不要太高估人的能力·····

作者: xibao 时间: 2011-3-26 00:33
谢谢你！！！！

哎。。悲剧啊。~~~~ 只能这样理解了~~

作者: zzloveyibo 时间: 2014-3-14 14:54

sugaryun 发表于 2010-7-31 00:14
原文中说了“due to a major earthquake known to have occurred near the island in A.D. 365.” 正如OG的 ...

我觉得C的错不都在于重复论点，最根本在于
Most modern histories of Cyprus mention that an earthquake occurred near the island in A.D. 365.

这儿的介词短语很重要，他说的是在AD365有个地震发生在小岛附近，那我可以削弱他说：小岛上有很多个城市，那这个地震刚好没发生在这个K城市，所以，C选项不能support预测。
个人理解

作者: 强森 时间: 2017-12-29 19:27
答案d只说了发现这一时间段的东西，但不能证明在这之后就没有东西被发现了。而b选项就很好的说明了这一点。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)