标题: 请教一道GWD逻辑 [打印本页] 作者: cx89916 时间: 2010-7-19 16:02 标题: 请教一道GWD逻辑 T-4-Q21 d e The OLEX Petroleum Company has recently determined that it could cut its refining costs by closing its Grenville refinery and consolidating all refining at its Tasberg refinery. Closing the Grenville refinery, however, would mean the immediate loss of about 1,200 jobs in the Grenville area. Eventually the lives of more than 10,000 people would be seriously disrupted. Therefore, OLEX’s decision, announced yesterday, to keep Grenville open shows that at OLEX social concerns sometimes outweigh the desire for higher profits.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument given?
A. The Grenville refinery, although it operates at a higher cost than the Tasberg refinery, has nevertheless been moderately profitable for many years. B. Even though OLEX could consolidate all its refining at the Tasberg plant, doing so at the Grenville plant would not be feasible. C. The Tasberg refinery is more favorably situated than the Grenville refinery with respect to the major supply routes for raw petroleum. D. If the Grenville refinery were ever closed and operations at the Tasberg refinery expanded, job openings at Tasberg would to the extent possible be filled with people formerly employed at Grenville. E. Closure of the Grenville refinery would mean compliance, at enormous cost, with demanding local codes regulating the cleanup of abandoned industrial sites. 答案选E，为什么D不行呢作者: wangsiwei 时间: 2010-7-20 12:03
我觉得吧，这个题的结论是－－继续开G厂不是因为利润而是因为social。weaken的话，就要提出实际上就是为了利润。只有E可以 D中厂子的工人从那里来的，跟结论无关。而且就算有关，也是support了结论，更注重social。作者: aary431 时间: 2010-7-20 12:55
对的，题目注重的是说social and profit 的关系，突出的是social,结论就用profit来反驳它、