ChaseDream

标题: 【十.封.信.】GMAT 770 Q&A第九封Schedule&第十封GMAT（新添OG12SC總結，簡體版EXCEL's在47樓）。希望CDe [打印本页]

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-18 22:21
标题: 【十.封.信.】GMAT 770 Q&A第九封Schedule&第十封GMAT（新添OG12SC總結，簡體版EXCEL's在47樓）。希望CDe
About CD

Sorry that 10 has to type in English to express himself freely because of his poor Mandarin. But at least 10 managed to use his poor Mandarin to briefly introduce his made-by-himself GMAT stuff.
CD should be the best gift that GMAT gave 10.

So at the very beginning 10 skimmed through the Internet to search some information about GMAT and luckily discovered CD, just as 10 walked through the beach and luckily discovered a pearl. And then CD became the reason why 10 dared not turn to XDF, because 10 could find whatever he is searching for here, including the data and, way more important, the folks.

It’s CDers who bring CD a sense of homestead. 10 can find guides and companions everywhere. As a guy with a little special identity, 10 learn from them not only how to prepare GMAT, but also how united Chinese are and how proud he is as a Chinese, a fact that makes him convinced that one day Chinese would take the place of Jew to dominate the financial world practically. Given the situation of China’s financial market, there is undoubtedly long way behind, but China has the best team—CD.

10 has gained too much from CD, and he definitely wants to do something in return. Thus, as is mentioned above, 10 prepared some made-by-himself GMAT stuff attached at the end of this part.

Like many other CDers, 10 pick out the correct SC sentences of OG10, OG12, PREP 1 (Old version) and PREP 2 (Old version). The difference lies in that 10 also marks the points on the sentences, a method that 10 hopes would better emphasize the points when CDers look through or read loud those correct sentences. In fact, 10 just substituted those marked sentences for his own SC summary.

Another thing for SC is the SC summary of OG11. It is sort of analogous to the famous SC summary of Green Hand, but this one just apply to EXCEL the classification of OG11’s own SC points. Maybe it can be called the official one. However, there is something about it 10 needs to state. 10 himself never uses this summary, for 10 just made this work solely for CDers by fits and snatches one afternoon. Nevertheless, 10 believes that it still accords with the implicit thought of OG.

10 also made a summary of CR in the form of EXCEL. He just collects all the CR questions and OG explanations and adopt both the FEIFEI CR classification and the Lawyer CR classification. CDers can choose either one for their own sake.

The last but least one is a pack of RC summary. One is 10’s first run summary of OG10’s RC in Word version, and the other is an EXCEL version based on the former one. 10 believes that the best way to use this work is to apply to it Xiaoan’s reading method. CDers can take advantage of the function of EXCEL to classify and to filtrate, in order to fulfill several round of reviewing GMAT RC.

Besides, more detailed descriptions can be found in the Intro. Part of most of the stuff. CDers can look them through after downloading the stuff.

In order to upload different kinds of stuff, 10 has to divide what he wants to share with all the CDers into several parts. And 10 would attach other kinds of stuff (some are made by other CDers but are superbly useful in 10’s opinion.) and 10’s special thought about those topics. The rest of other parts would come out one after another—about SC, about RC, about CR, about Qua, about AWA, about JJ, about model test, about schedule, and GMAT.

It took 10 pretty long time to prepare the GMAT stuff, and 10 sincerely hopes that the stuff can do those CDers who are about to take GMAT soon a favour. Therefore, until he completes all, 10 just puts on what he has finished first.

Unlike other CDers, 10 is still a undergraduate student and don’t need to face intense applying process next term, so 10 will guard in this post in the coming future. If CDers have any question about anything, 10 will give it his best shot to answer with Mandarin.

At last, trillions of thanks, you all.

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-18 22:22
About SC

As the saying goes, SC is enthroned. This saying is partially indisputable, since it is the last two SC questions that leave 10 no time at all and make 10 randomly choose two answers.

Besides, SC should be the most essential way to boost one’s Verbal grade in a short time, for there are so many skills in SC that could help one deal with SC questions. One is relatively difficult to bone on RC and CR, for both two depend more on one’s English level.

In practice, 10 tends to believe that with a high-class reading ability, CDers are able to quickly adapt their own reasoning to that of GMAT and thus to get a satisfactory grade in pretty short time, a reason why there are so many topics such as “ 7X0+ in less than X0 days”. In 10’s opinion, switching the reasoning includes two different parts, handling the SC points and grasping the logic of passage in a short time. Now 10 wants to talk about handling the SC points first.

As simply for skills, XDF seems to reach the peak of the perfection, and Lily undoubtedly excels in XDF—Rule 1, use “such as” when taking sth for example; Rule 2, understand the usage of “consider”… you name it. Those skills are amazingly good for those who have to get a not-bad result of GMAT in a short time, because the skills are so simple as to remember. However, 10 just believes that XDF’s skills would help one reach 700+, given that other parts are not that bad, but that if one wants a grade of 750+, he or she must jump beyond the so-called skills. What if Rule 1 runs against Rule 11 in a single SC question? Which one should take precedence over the other? This kind of situation is quite common in GWD, and of course in GMAT. This dilemma is what the so-called skills cannot solve at all.

CDers may ask:” How to deal with this dilemma?” In fact, that is just the reason why 10 can’t emphasize the correct sentences in OG and PREP too much. It is definitely fantastic way to help CDers get used to and then understand the SC points. Believe it or not, it is said that reading these correct sentences intensely everyday can make one’s GMAT grade reach 700 as well. With the points marked, those sentences, as far as 10 is concerned, can work way better. A little waring-- please don't read the correct sentences of PREP, unless CDers have determined to desert PREP as a useful model test.

Since at the very beginning the diagnostic test of OG—a bonus point that would be explained in later part— shows that 10 are pretty weak in SC part, a single fact that should bring CDers lot of confidence, 10 spent quite a long time preparing SC. He has used Baiyong, OG10, OG12, PREP and GWD. In fact, they all collect the real questions in GMAT. Moreover, OG10, OG11, OG12 also contain the explanation of OG. Practically, Baiyong, OG10, OG11, OG12 are analogous to each other in terms of degree of difficulty. Baiyong is well classified but it is somewhat out-of-date and contains some XDF stereotypes. OG10 is also kind of out but it has a large number of questions and too many aces’ painstaking effort is involved in it. OG11 is in an embarrassing situation but 10 himself made a summary of it. Considering the special status of OG12, PREP and GWD, 10 sincerely recommend that CDers never ever ignore any of them.

As a result, CDers should choose proper amount of materials to practice according to their SC level. In other word, they should critically add some of those things mentioned above to accompany OG12, PREP and GWD when reviewing SC. And it pays to focus oneself on SC.

Most importantly, whenever CDers finish a kind of SC materials, you must record the wrong answer. Be thankful to those questions which get you wrong rather than simply condemn yourselves, for they pinpoint your weak points rather than leave those weak points till the final GMAT. Then you have to review and analyze them comprehensively so that you can overcome them and avoid making the same mistakes any more. Only in this way can you get improvement after finishing a round of SC reviewing.

A supplemental instruction is that if CDers are really short of time and consider 700 a good enough grade to apply for their dream school, the summaries of Tonyaddidas and of Lily really have some magic power, so 10 will attach them to the post as well. But 10 still hope that CDers can do way much better, simply because what others summarize could no way become yours only by your learning by rote.

[attach]79160[/attach][attach]78972[/attach][attach]78976[/attach][attach]78975[/attach][attach]78974[/attach][attach]78973[/attach]

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-18 22:22
About RC

At first, realizing that tons of CDers are puzzled about whether they need to recite the GMAT vocabulary, 10 would like to offer a relatively simple method to deal with this problem. Just pick up several passages in the OG12, and read them to find out whether CDers meet difficulty in understanding the basic idea of them by guessing the meaning of those unfamiliar words. Then CDers could soon know the answer by themselves. Take 10 for example. He always finds guessing quite useful as well as interesting, and he didn’t have too many problems reading the passages even in the real GMAT. However, if CDers have enough time, to acquire more English words wouldn’t hurt as well.

Besides, CDers with problems about understanding the long, difficult sentences can refer to Yangpeng's method, which has been attached already.

Then it comes to grasping the logic of passage in a short time. Interestingly, 10 isn’t talking about CR, but rather RC indeed. Many guys with a marvelous English background may perform badly in the RC. They can handle every word in the passage but cannot grasp the logic at all, especially when time is so limited that they have only two minutes to deal with each question.

It’s actually not difficult to overcome this problem. CDers just need enough practice to help them get the key to GMAT RC. Here 10 sincerely recommends the Xiaoan’s reading method, which would be another attachment in the post as well. From 10’s point of view, this method is to teach CDers how to grasp the logic of the passage through glancing over it, and then orientate the information of the question on the passage to find out the answer. The summary of 10 may be a useful tool for CDers to take use of this method to deal with RC. Thanks to EXCEL, its functions to classify and to filtrate are so powerful that it does help a lot.

As for 10’s own sake, he didn’t employ too much material in the RC part, just reusing the 82 passages in the OG10 and Daquan for maybe 3 or 4 rounds. The more he analyzed, the more brief the logic picture of the passage became and the easier he found RC. At last those pictures seemed printed in 10’s brain, but CDers could draw them down if necessary. A good example of how to draw logic pictures is provided by Mumu, and 10 will undoubtedly attach her method to the post. By the way, the method 10 used in the Run 1 of RC Sum is analogous to Mumu’s, so CDers can have a look at it.

Some CDers can turn to Annie’s method. Annie figured out a way to deal with the nearly 24 passages in the OG12 in less than 8 hours, which sounds awesome and would also be attached. However, 10 is somewhat worried that only 24 passages may be not enough for CDers to practice so as to switch CDers’ reasoning. But CDers with too little can have a try. Little is more than none after all.

Last but not least, when CDers reach the spurting stage, the classification of GWD RC would take the place and become the touchstone to evaluate what the level of RC is. CDers should cherish it since it may be the last chance to spot the problems remained and make a difference.

Besides, RC JJ would be fantastic in the GMAT, and 10 would provide more detail about it in the coming JJ part as well.

[attach]78970[/attach]
[attach]78971[/attach]

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-18 22:22
About CR

Now it’s CR’s show time.

There are two superstars—Lawyer and Feifei— in this field, as far as 10 knows.

It is known that 10 respects XYMM so much that the ten-letters series draw the experience of XYMM’s little-classroom series. However, it is in the CR that 10 parts company with XYMM for the first time, and maybe the only one time. In fact, XYMM was strongly for Lawyer’s method, while 10 feels kind of puzzled about it. Anyone who ever tries to sort the CR questions in the OG12 by Lawyer’s type might meet lot of difficulties, perhaps because the CR questions have changed a lot since GMAC broke up with ETS. 10 is wondering whether Lawyer’s method could still perfectly apply to the new generation of CR questions.

In contrast, Feifei’s method of classification still works quite well according to 10’s summary, only because it came out lately. Nevertheless, 10 finds Feifei’s A-B theory troublesome enough to understand as well as to employ.

Frankly, 10 believes that CR is the easiest part for English whizzes, for you cannot get the answer wrong as long as you understand what the passage says and what the question asks. Maybe simply to read, and better to read by type, with the help of 10’s CR summary is the best way for CDers to improve your ability to deal with the CR problem. To be honest, CR may be the strongest part of 10, so 10 are pretty self-confident in his work. The OG10 and OG12 should offer enough CR questions for CDers to practice, especially for those English whizzes. In the most of time, 10 tended to make no more than one RC error in a set of verbal questions. The only reason for the exception is that 10 failed to understand the meaning of the passage. However, 10 felt uncertain when dealing with the CR questions and may not perform well enough in the GMAT, for the two-week final exam in the university left no time for GMAT at all and totally sweep away 10’s sense of handling the GMAT questions, a lesson would be talked about in the latter part and CDers should learn from.

Besides, 10 also has to suggest that, as is the case with the RC, CDers not insert any personal assumption into the CR passages, since the GMAT is for Americans and we Chinese all know how simple and direct their reasoning is, right?

Anyway, as a green hand, 10 may be seriously wrong in terms of evaluating superstars’ methods, so 10 also attach these two methods to the post. Perhaps 10 is just not brilliant enough to get their points. And 10 sincerely hopes that CDers can get what 10 failed in these two masterpieces, because they are so thought-provoking and have led many seniors to success.

Last but not least, the classification of GWD CR would work just as well as that of RC in the last step—to spurt. If CDers wants to learn more, please wait for the coming part—about schedule. THX.

[attach]78969[/attach]

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-18 22:23
标题: About Qua
Frankly, 10’s experience in Qua may not be as useful for CDers as that in Ver, since 10 really spent too little time and energy on Qua.

The time and energy 10 determined to allocate for each subject depended on the potential of each subject to boost 10’s total GMAT score. Since 10 never failed to get a 51 in each practice test in GMATPrep, 10 guessed that maybe it would be more worthy to focus on the Ver part. Luckily, 10 also got a 51 in the GMAT, otherwise 10 could have been very regretful about that.

10 is still an undergraduate student in the university so that he still has to face some Maths problems at class, making Maths still a familiar part for 10. However, 10 realizes that many of CDers have graduated from university for quite a long time, so they may have totally forgotten the Maths. In this case, a complete overview can do lots of good, from 10’s own perspective. As for this reason, 10 glanced through most of the stuff for Qua part, and picked up three of them, which may be quite easy but thorough enough and includes the ChenXiangdong’s, which is too large to attach so CDers have to search by themselves, and the XDF notes for Qua from the Online course ( CDers can also find the XDF notes and videos for other part of GMAT, but 10 finds that maybe only those for SC, CR and Qua are worthwhile enough). The Qua questions in Feifei’s may be a little more difficult than those in GMAT. Nevertheless, since 10 could not go deep into the stuff, he may make some awful suggestions. Thus, CDers are supposed to skim over those different kinds of stuff and choose one of them, only one or no of them.

Moreover, JJ is deemed as the most important part for Qua, not only because JJ can provide the best practice content but also because CDers may run across tons of JJ in the GMAT! In 10’s opinion, obtaining a consistent score of 49 or 50 in the GMATPrep, CDers could get one or two more points in the GMAT, with the help of JJ.

Oh, 10 almost forgot a essential point for Qua. However high the score of GMATPrep is, CDers should never forget to master the useful terms of Qua. As is the case with CR and RC, if one could not understand the meaning of the Qua question, how can he or she know the answer exactly? Therefore, CDers may need to read the description in the OG, and recite one of the Qua vocabulary attached.

May all CDers can get a Qua score of 51 and then show the world how intelligent Chinese are.

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-18 22:23
标题: About AWA
AWA must be a lesson CDers should learn from 10’s little tragedy.

Without much time left, 10 only had three afternoons—maybe a total time of 8 or 9 hours—to prepare for AWA, one to make the DIY AA template, one to get the AI one from CD, and one to recite both of them. Ironically, 10 once hoped to get a satisfactory score in GMAT. Of course, he failed to do so at last.

In fact, 10 still managed to type more than 500 words in each half-hour try, but got a reaaaaly low score—4, or precisely 19%. Frankly, 10 always and forever believe in his logic thinking so as to have enough confidence in his CR as well as in his AA. As is mentioned above, 10 made his own AA template, and is still convinced that his AA score could by no means be lower than 5.5, with such logical structure, such three reasonable responses and such many words. As a result, 10 guesses that the total AWA score has suffer a lot from the AI template. Anyway, 10 is not the only victim who got hurt when simply adopting the AI template. Thus, 10 sincerely recommend that CDers carefully consider coping, or simply putting together, the templates in CD, especially those quite ancient ones. Maybe GMAT AWA scoring system has already recorded some specific sentences and phrases as low-score signals.

Consequently, and sadly, 10 could not share too much own experience with CDers about AWA. But 10 still hopes to put on several materials he never used but finds perhaps useful—a practice software and some files.
CDers must turn to the experts in this field and look for more helpful advices. 10 is just a loser in term of AWA after all.

Everyone says that the AWA score doesn’t count a lot, but no one will refuse a higher score, right? Anyway, good luck, guys.

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-18 22:23
标题: About practice tests
As for practice tests, 10 would like to talk about GMATPrep and GWD, since 10 only took these two. However, helpful CDers do offer other marvelous materials too—10 free online practice tests from different agencies in the Download district and 9 paper tests which CDers used to pay to get from mba.com in the GMAT-preparation district. CDers can freely choose some of them, if needed.
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_Math/thread-446348-1-1.html
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_Preparation/thread-470626-1-1.html

However, 10 still find it important that CDers focus more on GMATPrep and GWD, for they both collect real questions from GMAT and involve too much painstaking effort of seniors.

Now let’s compare and contrast GMATPrep and GWD. The greatest advantage of GMATPrep is that the system of GMATPrep is exactly the same as that of GMAT, providing the best way to practice CDers’ pace and to evaluate CDers’ level, even though the questions in GMATPrep will never appear in the real GMAT again. Nevertheless, in order to maintain its usefulness, CDers are supposed not to take any of the GMATPrep SC questions or GWD, since it is likely to meet the same questions and make the practice tests lose their originality. However, GMATPrep has only two practices of two sets of questions while CDers definitely need more tests to practice. If keeping taking these two tests, CDers might meet a lot of familiar questions as well. Besides, a lot of CDers need to take practice tests by stage and another one before the real test, creating a dilemma. 10 recommend a solution—since GMATPrep has an old version and a new one which is added some new questions on the basis of the old version, CDers can firstly make use of the old one to take practice tests by stage , and then the new one before the real test.

As far as 10, except the first practice test of GMATPrep with a score of 770, 10 all got 790 in others so that he was called the emperor of practice tests by some of his friends. Sadly, 10 just got 770 in the real GMAT, a fact that ironically prove the accuracy of GMATPrep. 10 found the mood when taking the real one is hugely different from that of the practice ones. In the real GMAT, 10 was too relaxed at first and too nervous at last, leaving no enough time to complete the last two SC questions. Taking the lesson from 10, CDers should predetermine the mood when taking the real GMAT. Just from time to time imagine what mood you should be in when meeting different kinds of situation and you will surely be well-prepared.

As it comes to GWD, 10 has to state that there are two different ways to use GWD. One is the sets of GWD questions mainly for practicing pace, and the other is the classification of GWD questions mainly for maintain the feeling of solving different kinds of questions in the spurting stage. The greatest advantage of GWD is that there are a lot of real questions—thanks to the guys who snatched them—and CDers may run across the same questions in the real GMAT, a advantage that is shrinking because GWD is becoming increasingly out-of-day and more GWD questions appear in the New GMATPrep. However, before there appear other better materials to practice and spurt, CDers should not give up GWD. If you meet one GWD RC passage in the real GMAT, you will then realize how priceless GWD is. As is mentioned in the previous part of the series of ten-letters, the classification of GWD is a fantastic stuff for practice in the spurting stage. CDers should cherish it since it may be the last chance to spot the problems remained and make a difference.

At the same time, 10 should state that the answers to GWD are not always correct, for those guys can only snatch the questions rather than the answers, and we CDers have to figure out the answers all by ourselves after intense discussion. 10 will attach the revised his own answer sheet for GWD, in which the yellow cell means doubt and the yellow cell with bracket in it means that 10 has found sufficient evidence that the original answer is wrong and the right one lies in the bracket. As well, CDers can by the way have an idea about the errors 10 has made in GWD. However, CDers should not focus too much on the result of GWD, not only because the scoring system of GMAT never be applied to GWD but also because GWD just work as practice tests after all.

Let 10 put it this way, it is only the score of the real GMAT that counts in the single cell for GMAT CDers send to your dream school. Therefore, you guys know what 10 means, right?

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-18 22:23
About JJ

10 didn’t find JJ that useful until he took the real GMAT. It seemed that all the RC passages and more than 70% Q questions 10 met were from JJ, a fortune that has saved 10 tons of time. Consequently, 10 strongly hope that CDers can trickily choose a great time for enough JJ. As far as 10 knows, one-week JJ is quite enough. If CDers took the real GMAT with two-week JJ as 10 did, 10 believes that CDers would undoubtedly have a sumptuous JJ dinner!

To cut the crap, 10 directly arranges different kinds of JJ in order of priority—GWD JJ> Qua JJ> RC JJ>> SC, CR JJ.

The greatest advantage of GWD JJ is that CDers can find out the complete original information so as to deeply think about and discuss the questions rather than simply guess a lot with the help of other CDers’ memory. Imagine that you just meet a GWD passage in the real GMAT but you could hardly recall much of it. What a shame! Thus, if CDers find any original GWD question in the JJ file, please do cherish it.

Qua JJ is another gift that can save us lots of time. It is known that the Math in US is much too easy for us Chinese. With a lot of talents discussing those primary-school Math questions, how can we not figure out the answer? However, 10 would like to remind CDers that we had better know the method of solving the questions rather than simply remember the answers themselves, because GMAT may be so foxy as to revise the questions and then trap us.

RC JJ may be the most controversial one, since there plenty of CDers for it and against it at the same time. It can indeed both save your time and provide an answer when we have no idea at all, while it may also mislead us for the CDers themselves might make mistakes when taking the GMAT. Considering this dilemma, 10 would like to advise CDers to choose the RC JJ wisely. Whether the RC JJ is good depends not on whether the author’s score is higher than 700 but on whether the logic of it is clear enough. CDers should make use of RC JJ to get a basic idea of the logic rather recite all the content of RC JJ. And 10 hopes that those CDers who share their JJ had better grasp the logic, and tell in paragraph at least.

As for SC JJ and CR JJ, 10 himself didn’t read them before taking the GMAT, and still don’t recommend CDers to pay too much attention to them, not only because there are too many questions for JJ authors to remember clearly, but also because GMAT can easily revise the questions and CDers would suffer a lot from the unspecific information.

As last, 10 would like to sincerely thank those CDers who share their JJ and who help arrange JJ. It is them who perform real deeds for us CDers while 10 is uttering bullshit. Trillions of thanks, guys. You live in the shadow but always shine.

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-18 22:24
标题: About schedule
Considering all things mentioned or not mentioned above, 10 wants to share with CDers some personal views about the schedule for GMAT.

10 notices that many green hands would just swallow down the schedules of the pros who got high score in GMAT, regardless of the huge difference between them. This misconduct would tend to do harm rather than good. Practically, 10 believes that the best outfit is the one that fits, so here 10 just provides a simple framework rather than too much specific information, and CDers have to work out your own schedule after checking out reviewing what 10 told and what fits you. The time span, intensity control and stuff selection is totally under your control, since CDers must get the hand of enough information about GMAT after reading the previous letters of 10’s ten-letter series.

Step 1: To comprehend GMAT—Obey your thirst (Spring).

If CDers have to do something, you must know it inside out, otherwise how can you cope with it? Thus, the best ceremony for your GMAT is to log on CD, and to find out useful information and stuff as much as possible. Like 10 himself, CDers must be quite curious about GMAT as the very beginning, so here 10 uses the phrase—obey your thirst—from Spring. Please do pay enough attention on the posts stuck on the top, which the moderators considerately prepare for you. And if CDers can keep an eye on 10’s post, 10 would cherish so.

Step 2: To work out a plan—Intelligence everywhere (Motorola).

After finishing the Step 1, it is time for CDers to carry on. 10 refers to the famous phrase of Motorola—intelligence everywhere, because in this step CDers have to comprehensively consider tons of things—what your goal is, what level you are in, how much time you got, or whatever. If your dream school just need you to score 700, maybe it would be a waste of time to consume too much to pursue a 750, even though the higher score the better, because GMAT is just one of the measurement of how potential you are to become a marvelous business manager, and it may pay more for you to focus your priceless time and energy on other parts. Most importantly, CDers are supposed to make good use of the Diagnostic Test on the OG12, because it would help you determine what your level is in different parts of GMAT, and thus how to work out a plan for GMAT.

Step 3: To conquer each part respectively—Let’s make things better (Philips).

Now, it comes to Step 3. The reason why 10 cites the phrase—let’s make things better is that this step is the best opportunity for CDers to improve their score.

Take SC for example; if CDers just are in the level of Average in SC, based on the result of the Diagnostic Test, and you want to score 750 in GMAT, you definitely need to greatly improve your skills in dealing with SC questions. Maybe you need three or four rounds for SC preparation. The stuff for first round could be Baiyong or OG10, that for second OG12, and that for third PREP SC. 10 couldn’t emphasize the importance of analyzing the questions after finishing each round because it is the analysis rather than the simple answer that matters. Besides, when conquering SC part, CDers should also keep basic practice of other parts of GMAT in order to preserve the feeling of dealing with all kinds of questions of GMAT. 10 himself did suffer a lot from the interruption the final exams brought to GMAT, and he almost lost all the feelings he got previously and then performed badly in the real GMAT.

After dealing with the SC part, CDers can move on to others. It is worthwhile to take a practice test to check out the effect because it could pinpoint your weakness after all.

As for 10 himself, he focused more on SC and RC, less on CR, and almost none on Q and AWA in this step, and it all depends.

Step 4: To spurt—Just do it (Nike).

Just do it. In fact, that just do so would be more proper, but who cares? 10 is quite Nike, so he uses this phrase to show the determination in the last step. It should be the arena for GWD and JJ. The sets of GWD questions mainly for practicing pace, and the other is the classification of GWD questions mainly for maintain the feeling of solving different kinds of questions. And everyone knows the function of JJ, right.

And once again, 10 has to state that this step may be the last chance to spot the problems remained and make a difference. Anyway, CDers should be value it as well as keep confident and winded down, because no pain, no gain, while pain, gain.

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-18 22:24
标题: About GMAT
10 has been kind of lost since he finished GMAT. At first, he just thought that he was still caring the no-good end that he had to randomly choose two answers for the last two SC questions because of his disrupted pace. However, it came to him that maybe he is indeed missing GMAT. Maybe GMAT has grown on him, as a part of his life.

This situation sounds a little weird because at the very beginning 10 chose GMAT simply because he would die rather than recite the gross vocabulary of GRE. In addition, with only experience with paper test at that time, he just considered not only the CAT but also the system of grading something from outer space.

Nevertheless, step by step, 10 came to know GMAT increasingly. He started to reach CD, OG, SC, GWD, JJ … or whatever, tons of concepts which he would not have known if he had just chosen another orientation. Let’s put it this way, 10 started a fancy journey, actually.

10 somewhat disliked the phrase “to kill G”, even though he deeply understood what is involved in this single phrase—determination, diligence, fulfillment, and maybe more than he could mention. But 10 had been a big GMAT freak totally. He just believed that to kill G is definitely not the best way to be along with G. Maybe to love G is the answer everyone is looking for. Just as IB won’t give the best opportunity to those who simply want the money of it, so GMAT won’t give the best grade to those who simply want the single result and then immediately run away. The best part lies throughout the journey rather than just at the ending spot. To 10, GMAT is not a single milestone to polish him up, but rather a precious process in which he grows up.

Moreover, GMAT has given 10 something more—a switch of reasoning, a priceless CD, and an opportunity to chase dream. He finds prose precisely over his head because he could find on point in it and thus not figure out the logic. He gets used to wandering in CD whenever he gains access to Internet. He sort of begins to believe that his life is not totally of no use at all. Everyone knows that 10 used to be a student who repeated one-year study and never became the “three good” student even in the primary school, right?

But now, considering that his GMAT is over, what is 10 supposed to do? Totally cross GMAT out of his mind and then become a simple-minded, homeless and futureless guy again? 10 is pretty puzzled.

A friend of 10’s, to whom 10 happened to mention to her his bottom line of not taking another test, ran across 10 and asked:” How is the GMAT? Does it meet the bottom line?” “Neither more nor less.” 10 forced a smile, and then talked about the disrupted pace and the pity that he didn’t finish GMAT in fact and the dilemma he got in.

“What a shame. So you are going to take GMAT again?” she asked, after listening to all the bullshit. “Of course not. 770 is not that satisfactory but acceptable, for it meets my bottom line after all. Besides, my folks would find me crazy to take War Ⅱ with a grade of 770.” “ What indeed matters is neither what your bottom line is nor what others think, but what you want unconsciously.” she interrupted 10. Her words did provoke some thought of 10’s.

Perhaps, after coping with other stuff he has to take care, 10 would squeeze some time to have a second try. Whether the grade is higher than 770 seems not to count that much. 10 just need a complete ending for his journey.

Maybe someone is ready to open fire now, but please forgive 10, for he is simply deep in love with GMAT.

作者: msqjz501 时间: 2010-7-18 23:15
占樓

作者: DennisLeBel 时间: 2010-7-18 23:29
占樓

作者: 踏雪无痕1989 时间: 2010-7-19 00:49
额。。。。。。。

作者: amylyst 时间: 2010-7-19 01:01
thx for sharing~

作者: floret0306 时间: 2010-7-19 01:16

good job， thx

作者: youngerlee 时间: 2010-7-19 08:49
XD, 煲冬瓜无问题~大家都能懂滴,放心~英文大家也都懂滴,再次放心~

thx for sharing~

作者: nhelpn 时间: 2010-7-19 09:16
谢谢楼主，学习啦

作者: fly12404 时间: 2010-7-19 09:46
好可怕
相形見絀...

THANKS FOR SHARING

作者: keith139 时间: 2010-7-19 22:09
谢谢楼主

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-19 22:19

XD, 煲冬瓜无问题~大家都能懂滴,放心~英文大家也都懂滴,再次放心~

thx for sharing~

-- by 会员 youngerlee (2010/7/19 8:49:11)

其實我明白CDers可能真的沒有太多時間讀那些English Bullshit。但如果有時間看看的話大概確然會有DD幫助吧。畢竟如果不是最後兩道SC沒時間做的話，可能也不只770的。Anyway，謝謝謝謝youngerlee 大蝦給我安慰。

作者: DennisLeBel 时间: 2010-7-19 23:49
跟进了...觉得你把各种材料理解的很透彻了...一定是认真地复习了较长时间.

THX. I WILL WAIT FOR THE COMPLETION OF YOUR ELABORATE SKYSCRAPER

作者: ghovik 时间: 2010-7-20 01:23
赞美LZ..尤其是框框版的OG正确句子

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-20 23:10

跟进了...觉得你把各种材料理解的很透彻了...一定是认真地复习了较长时间.

THX. I WILL WAIT FOR THE COMPLETION OF YOUR ELABORATE SKYSCRAPER

-- by 会员 DennisLeBel (2010/7/19 23:49:06)

Maybe overpraise. 10 just wants to do something for CDers, since he owes to them that much.

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-20 23:12

赞美LZ..尤其是框框版的OG正确句子

-- by 会员 ghovik (2010/7/20 1:23:41)

小事啦。其實也許大家自己去劃框框可能更有幫助。哦，突然想起一件事需要提醒，在第一次PREP模考之前不建議碰PREP正確句子的。

作者: youngerlee 时间: 2010-7-20 23:18
楼主谦虚了,你才是大牛^^download了这些资料,等待10封信完结篇~

BTW 大牛的英文经验可以激励我看下去...就当练英文咯~

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-20 23:31

楼主谦虚了,你才是大牛^^download了这些资料,等待10封信完结篇~

BTW 大牛的英文经验可以激励我看下去...就当练英文咯~

-- by 会员 youngerlee (2010/7/20 23:18:55)

THX.
其實我的英語也不怎麼樣。My tongue is Cantonese.
大家都加油~~~

作者: nowwsy 时间: 2010-7-20 23:33
感谢lz的分享~
很用心很有用。

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-20 23:40

感谢lz的分享~
很用心很有用。

-- by 会员 nowwsy (2010/7/20 23:33:37)

THX.
能對CDers有小小幫助就滿足了...

作者: youngerlee 时间: 2010-7-20 23:44
waah, 看了10总结的excel,佩服得五体投地...high score确实不是随便得来的啊~

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-20 23:48

waah, 看了10总结的excel,佩服得五体投地...high score确实不是随便得来的啊~

-- by 会员 youngerlee (2010/7/20 23:44:17)

其實真的有點overprepared了，不過當時就想再不濟也能為CD做點貢獻。還要感謝學校一堆公共課讓我在課堂上自由整理資料。

作者: 维小C 时间: 2010-7-21 00:16
mark

作者: Zeros 时间: 2010-7-21 02:40
谢谢10，期待你的大作早日完成！

作者: lydiahst 时间: 2010-7-21 05:10
ddddddddddddddddddddddddd

作者: everc 时间: 2010-7-21 09:39
Thanks for sharing the materials.

作者: 痴迟 时间: 2010-7-21 09:52
感谢楼主分享！还能顺便联系一下阅读！哈哈！

作者: greatbelief 时间: 2010-7-21 12:14
楼主牛人啊！谢谢这些资料啊！

作者: 改变自己ggcc 时间: 2010-7-21 21:28
楼主强大~

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-21 22:51

谢谢10，期待你的大作早日完成！

-- by 会员 Zeros (2010/7/21 2:40:55)

昨晚和Zeros大牛對話（是不是應該用這個詞？confused）時，忘了向他表達自己膜拜之情--沒有Zeros等創始人，就沒有CD，更不會有我們這些CDers.
Sincerely, THX.

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-21 22:57

mark
-- by 会员维小C (2010/7/21 0:16:40)

ddddddddddddddddddddddddd
-- by 会员 lydiahst (2010/7/21 5:10:28)

Thanks for sharing the materials.
-- by 会员 everc (2010/7/21 9:39:28)

感谢楼主分享！还能顺便联系一下阅读！哈哈！
-- by 会员痴迟 (2010/7/21 9:52:25)

楼主牛人啊！谢谢这些资料啊！
-- by 会员 greatbelief (2010/7/21 12:14:10)

楼主强大~
-- by 会员改变自己ggcc (2010/7/21 21:28:51)

其實10自己一開始也是很懵懂的，在CD的幫助下一走下去，現在不過把自己的小小經驗教訓和CDers share一下，希望大家可以少走彎路，走社會主義道路。

作者: fly12404 时间: 2010-7-22 08:33
有下有推

作者: Ariel0607 时间: 2010-7-22 20:05
正在准备考试，看了10的帖子更觉得自己要努力了，10真的复习得好仔细，我要加油了！这么多宝贵的资料多谢分享了~~~~还有10赶紧更新吧~~~~~！！期待~~~

作者: clumsyorange 时间: 2010-7-22 22:12
太牛了~~

作者: sunbird520 时间: 2010-7-23 00:30
膜拜！！！！

作者: miller811 时间: 2010-7-23 01:32
此贴不留名枉为CD人

作者: guyuan0126 时间: 2010-7-23 08:40
强帖留名

作者: fly12404 时间: 2010-7-23 08:50
有下有推

作者: ckandpl 时间: 2010-7-23 11:03
看繁体字看的我难受的很~

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-23 12:24

看繁体字看的我难受的很~

-- by 会员 ckandpl (2010/7/23 11:03:50)

謝謝ckandpl 的寶貴建議。請原諒10平時用慣繁體了。10已經以最快速度用Word進行繁簡轉換，將幾個EXCEL‘s的Intro.Part改成簡體版本，請有需要的CDers在這裡下載。THX.
期待CDers的更多反饋哈。10會努力回覆和修改的。

其實10一開始做Sum of OG 11 SC是希望CDers可以用Correct Sentences來複習OG10，OG12的SC，然後再使用OG11的SC總結，這樣不完全重複地過OG SC可能效果會更好，但是從CDers的下載數目來看，OG 11還是相對被冷落了，也有CDers和10反映說，似乎OG11有點Out-of-Date，更希望使用OG12的總結來複習SC。
於是，10就抽空用類似Sum of OG 11 SC的方法做出了Sum of OG 12 SC，希望能更好地幫助CDers。由於做這份資料而耽誤【十.封.信.】的推出也請大家原諒。加油加油加油！！！
[attach]79160[/attach]

作者: flagleaf 时间: 2010-7-23 12:56
赞之……

作者: vivianxiong 时间: 2010-7-23 14:21
非常非常的强大~~~THX for sharing everything!!!!really helpful and powerful~~~!!!

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-23 18:41
(以下內容引自回覆ccfiona同學的消息）

ccfiona:
你好我是GMAT新手在CD上逛了逛感觉你是个大牛所以想问问机经的问题 1。机经是指哪里的题 2。机经的更换是怎么预测的？如果方便的话请你尽快回复我谢谢麻烦你了2010-07-23 12:11:42

10:
Fiona過譽了。1.機經指CDers分享的他們在GMAT真考中遇到的題目。由於GMAT是一段時間才換一次題庫，因此同月考試的CDers在換題庫前可能（幾乎是肯定）會遇到完全一樣的題目。這樣提前準備機經就能幫我們節省很多很多的時間，而且機經主人也常常分享自己的答案，大家可以討論后批判性選擇。2010-07-23 12:40:09

2.幾經更換并沒有及其確切的規律，但GMAT一般是一個月左右時間換一次題庫，極偶爾情況下會小於20天或者大於40天換一次題庫。一般來說，換題庫后一周機經已經很充足了，當時10是兩周后考，RC好像都是機經，數學也有七八成是機經。機經對10的幫助不可謂不大。2010-07-23 12:40:19

PS：
1.10之後會在 http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_Preparation/thread-470246-1-1.html 原貼紙上增添關於機經的更Detailed看法和建議，如有興趣可以關注。2010-07-23 12:40:27

2.CD上的機經專區有兩個貼紙對GreenHands瞭解機經有很大幫助。10嚴重建議閱讀：
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_Math/thread-256225-1-1.html 機經更換
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_Math/thread-420286-1-1.html 機經大全2010-07-23 12:40:34

3.因為Fiona你的問題挺有代表性，10可以在自己的貼紙上貼出來以幫助更多的CDers嗎？或者Fiona有什麽另外的要求也可以和10進一步聯繫。
愿Fiona可以取得理想的GMAT成績~ 2010-07-23 12:40:49

作者: 417362919 时间: 2010-7-23 19:34
10，I am in favor of your article. but I have a question:how can i read a passage in 2min(how i cathe the logic of a passage)?

i am so puzzeled about RC,CR.because i can't finish them in shorttime and the result of GDW makes me cry:the time is 100min for me(75 normal level),the wrong number is 20(10 normal level)

tell me the way to know the main idea which can help me inRC,CR

i am looking forward your reply.

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-23 21:11

10，I am in favor of your article. but I have a question:how can i read a passage in 2min(how i cathe the logic of a passage)?

i am so puzzeled about RC,CR.because i can't finish them in shorttime and the result of GDW makes me cry:the time is 100min for me(75 normal level),the wrong number is 20(10 normal level)

tell me the way to know the main idea which can help me inRC,CR

i am looking forward your reply.

-- by 会员 417362919 (2010/7/23 19:34:33)

RC
10想，也許最重要的是找出閱讀偏慢的原因。是1.單詞太多不會而猜測不准導致難以理解？是2.長難句閱讀出現困難（謝謝你的提醒，10還應該把長難句閱讀加入RC部份？是3.過於關注細節導致耗用太多時間？還是4.讀題定位出現問題、無法快速找到相應細節幫助答題？
如果是情況1，10建議你可以多做OG閱讀，攜隱MM建議4篇一組計時完成。但在按時完成一組后你可以細細查詢不認識或不確定的單詞，看看自己猜測與實意有多大出入。一般來說，第一遍RC複習過四十多篇RC后對猜詞的感覺就會出來了，如果按10的總結那樣完成82篇，相信單詞不會再成為CDers閱讀的困難所在，畢竟GMAT的重點單詞翻來覆去只有那麼幾十個，在不斷閱讀中應該可以掌握其基本含義，而剩下的單詞，要么是易猜測的單詞，要么是不重要的單詞，前者靠猜，後者只要記住定位就好。
如果是情況2，10推薦楊鵬長難句（10之後會附在RC Part上，如果10推薦的資料中有侵犯版權，請版主幫忙刪去，謝謝），CDers不一定把一百多句全部讀完，只需讀到閱讀長難句沒太大困難就行了。
如果是情況3、情況4，同樣應該在第一輪過小安閱讀法，做完每組題目后認真分析OG解釋，前者主要關注OG考點出現在文中的那一部份，慢慢就會形成做題感覺，知道哪些應該重點讀，哪些迅速看過有個印象就好，重點是把握住文章脈絡，細節只要記住關鍵詞便於定位就好。後者與上述方法類似，不過更要關注OG解釋中問題與文章對應部份的關鍵詞聯繫，一般來說，OG會很nice地提供相同的詞語幫助定位，CDers需要做的只是通過大量訓練找到尋找關鍵詞的方法。在文章中作記號的方法應該是很有幫助的。木木邏輯簡圖、Annie8小時技巧都是個中典範。

CR
這部份算10的強項，也許因此反而影響10對CR的理解導致無法更好地給大家深入意見。10只是覺得只要讀懂題意就能做出題，但很多時候我們並不能在如此短時間內迅速掌握Passage準確含義。10現在也不能馬上給大家提供較好的辦法，或者你可以嘗試理解Lawyer或Feifei的邏輯總結。10也會找時間再認真翻閱更多的CR總結，看看能不能找出一種快捷的方法幫助大家解題。但10依然相信，RC和CR是相輔相成的，只要一者水平提高，另一者也會受益匪淺。

作者: nowwsy 时间: 2010-7-24 00:25
我忍不住回个帖了。
lz好强大~好耐心的解答问题~

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-24 00:29

正在准备考试，看了10的帖子更觉得自己要努力了，10真的复习得好仔细，我要加油了！这么多宝贵的资料多谢分享了~~~~还有10赶紧更新吧~~~~~！！期待~~~

-- by 会员 Ariel0607 (2010/7/22 20:05:48)

Sorry啦，大家。10最近比較忙啦，只能每晚更新一封。不過10會爭取保證質量的~還有真的希望CDers可以及時提問和反饋，這樣10可以盡力把之後的內容做得更好。
同時借這個機會向之前給10提供很好很好問題和建議的CDers表達感謝哈，當然還有一直明確或默默支持10的大家~

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-24 00:30

我忍不住回个帖了。
lz好强大~好耐心的解答问题~

-- by 会员 nowwsy (2010/7/24 0:25:24)

版主言重了。CD向來都是互相幫助的地方啦~

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-24 00:57

-- by 会员 417362919 (2010/7/23 19:34:33)

至於417362919同學提到的MainIdea，小安曾經提過M題大家應幾乎保證100%的命中率。但事實上，看過10的RC Summary EXCEL的CDers都知道，其實10本身在M題上也犯過不少錯誤。M題的提高與正確抓住Passage的邏輯脈絡有極其大的關係。一個很好的例子就是10之前提到的木木邏輯簡圖了。417362919同學應該學會在一次次閱讀中學會畫出邏輯簡圖的方法。實在有困難可以先總結每段大意，再把各段大意連接在一起。
至於CR問題，10又想到了一點點，
首先當然做題順序是——看問題、看文段、再看選項。這個大家一定要記住，因為可以節省很多時間（一開始10以為這是所有人都知道的）。
其次是基本上每題CR都可以被我們粗略地分為證據和結論兩部份，如果問題問的是結論，就從文段中的證據推結論；如果問題不問結論，那麼首先就要在文段中找到結論到底是什麽，再看其他證據對結論的關係，從而根據題目問法決定怎麼增添新的證據。
值得提醒的是，GMAT考的是商業思維，強調要提供最重要的信息，因此CR文段上每一個點都一定是有用的。如果能有效利用這一點，相信很多題都可以輕鬆解決。

作者: cindybreakaway 时间: 2010-7-24 01:00
资料都很详尽，汇集了百家之资料啊！谢谢分享，CD真是个好地方！
想请教10大牛几个问题：
在做CR的时候，发现确实是看得明白就能选对。但是很多时候看完题干之后懵懵懂懂的，看选项更加乱，感觉像给CR牵着鼻子走。我已经把OG12的CR部分看了3遍，答案都可以背下来了，但是还是找不到门路。是不是没有好好消化OG？可是我又不知道现在可以做什么题目，是做FEIFEI还是GWD呢？
谢谢

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-24 01:20

资料都很详尽，汇集了百家之资料啊！谢谢分享，CD真是个好地方！
想请教10大牛几个问题：
在做CR的时候，发现确实是看得明白就能选对。但是很多时候看完题干之后懵懵懂懂的，看选项更加乱，感觉像给CR牵着鼻子走。我已经把OG12的CR部分看了3遍，答案都可以背下来了，但是还是找不到门路。是不是没有好好消化OG？可是我又不知道现在可以做什么题目，是做FEIFEI还是GWD呢？
谢谢

-- by 会员 cindybreakaway (2010/7/24 1:00:46)

這個問題嘛~~10想想，看過3遍是單指題目嗎？可能消化OG解釋更為重要吧。要好好分析自己爲什麽錯的。可能10這樣講有點空，但Cindy要明白爲什麽GMAC要考我們CR題，應該是鍛煉我們瞬間理解能力和梳理邏輯脈絡能力吧。10現在在想，爲什麽現在CR的BoldFace題越來越多呢？是不是GMAT暗示要強調我們理解每一個事件在整個大背景（是應該用這個詞嗎？sigh，10不知道）下到底起什麽作用？這樣的話，可能像10在上面所說的分清結論和證據，以及瞭解每個證據在整個邏輯中起什麽作用就顯得比較重要了~
至於該不該用新資料，這取決於Cindy你的GMAT Schedule啦啦啦。Feifei 10是沒怎麼用過的，這不代表不好，只是說明10不怎麼能提供切身體會。GWD CR分類最好留在衝刺階段做吧，可能。或者如果Cindy時間還充裕的話可以做OG10？也許用10做的CR EXCEL總結分類別用OG12 CR再一次訓練思維？

作者: miller811 时间: 2010-7-24 01:55
10 NN 你好，暂时先提一个关于CR的问题
我CR感觉还不错，之前从没看过任何方法，直接上GWD。一般1套题11个CR错2个或3个的样子

不过再怎么做题也无法得到突破了，总是有一些难题无法在第一次做的时候厘清关系，一部分是因为某些生僻的单词，但另一部分我认为还是因为我没有形成一个做题的套路。

所以今天开始试了试你推荐的FEIFEI方法，不过FEIFEI的笔记讲解的太简略了，还存有一些疑问。

一个是关于第三种文章结构的,与第一种文章相同，表面上是前提结论结构，实质为因果结构，即结论是前提的解释。这种结构我不太能理解，希望10能给我举例讲解一下。

其实我的感觉和你一样，只要CR读懂了应该就不错。不过可恶的是，有时文章的语言太复杂，导致意思理解不了，还有的时候是否定之后跟否定，题目还是削弱。。。。等于三重否定之类的题目。不知道你在面对这种语言比较难的题目时是怎么处理的呢？

作者: 金融小三 时间: 2010-7-24 09:46

作者: cindybreakaway 时间: 2010-7-24 12:21
[/quote]

這個問題嘛~~10想想，看過3遍是單指題目嗎？可能消化OG解釋更為重要吧。要好好分析自己爲什麽錯的。可能10這樣講有點空，但Cindy要明白爲什麽GMAC要考我們CR題，應該是鍛煉我們瞬間理解能力和梳理邏輯脈絡能力吧。10現在在想，爲什麽現在CR的BoldFace題越來越多呢？是不是GMAT暗示要強調我們理解每一個事件在整個大背景（是應該用這個詞嗎？sigh，10不知道）下到底起什麽作用？這樣的話，可能像10在上面所說的分清結論和證據，以及瞭解每個證據在整個邏輯中起什麽作用就顯得比較重要了~
至於該不該用新資料，這取決於Cindy你的GMAT Schedule啦啦啦。Feifei 10是沒怎麼用過的，這不代表不好，只是說明10不怎麼能提供切身體會。GWD CR分類最好留在衝刺階段做吧，可能。或者如果Cindy時間還充裕的話可以做OG10？也許用10做的CR EXCEL總結分類別用OG12 CR再一次訓練思維？

-- by 会员 GodMustBeCrazy (2010/7/24 1:20:41)

[/quote]

先谢谢10。
时间不多啦啦啦，想在八月份一战。之前已经复习了三个月，中间给期末考试中断了。而且CR一直做不好，心里很没底，还在痛苦中。
看了三遍是也包括解释，可是就是不开窍啊，郁闷。

作者: 417362919 时间: 2010-7-24 17:21
10.很谢谢你的耐心讲解。
RC，其实我在做OG12的时候，我每一篇都划了逻辑简图的（木木是我的范本），这几天定时做，一直只有50%的正确率。我觉得我有整体脉络，也会关键词定位，但是让我纠结的总是定位后，那句话和选项中的话意思一样，但是表达方式不一样，而有时重点单词，我又不晓得意思，所以总是2个选项间徘徊。
CR，正确率也差不多是一半，我觉得最重要的问题是理解，如果题读懂了，必对。否则比错。我是觉得CR还是有一定阅读量的，我是想问是够要用SC的方法，来抓主干，理脉络? sometimes or always i guess some words.

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-24 22:15

10 NN 你好，暂时先提一个关于CR的问题
我CR感觉还不错，之前从没看过任何方法，直接上GWD。一般1套题11个CR错2个或3个的样子

不过再怎么做题也无法得到突破了，总是有一些难题无法在第一次做的时候厘清关系，一部分是因为某些生僻的单词，但另一部分我认为还是因为我没有形成一个做题的套路。

所以今天开始试了试你推荐的FEIFEI方法，不过FEIFEI的笔记讲解的太简略了，还存有一些疑问。

一个是关于第三种文章结构的,与第一种文章相同，表面上是前提结论结构，实质为因果结构，即结论是前提的解释。这种结构我不太能理解，希望10能给我举例讲解一下。

其实我的感觉和你一样，只要CR读懂了应该就不错。不过可恶的是，有时文章的语言太复杂，导致意思理解不了，还有的时候是否定之后跟否定，题目还是削弱。。。。等于三重否定之类的题目。不知道你在面对这种语言比较难的题目时是怎么处理的呢？

-- by 会员 miller811 (2010/7/24 1:55:15)

10不是NN啦。只是小菜而已。不過還是謝謝Miller的稱讚。

如果按Miller所說，在複習初段一套題只錯2~3個CR真的真的非常不錯了。偶爾總有一些特別難讀的題目，也許這就需要我們在做完以後回過頭來細細分析，相信多讀幾題難題，CDers對CR題目的理解也會更深入了，10當時就是這樣過來的。其實CR的套路也就那麼多。理清結論、證據關係，選項用“相關\無關”方法判斷，注意不要加入過多的個人觀點，僅依照Passage所提供信息解答。

厄，事實上10只是覺得Feifei的分類方法還可取，把他所說的什麽結構之類的一併歸入那繁雜得可怕的“A-B理論”中，所以一時間很難給Miller提供例子。或許10找時間再去看看Feifei的相關內容，看看能不能給Miller新的解答？

至於語言比較難的題目，就像10剛才所說的，在做完後再認真重讀、分析，但根據10自己的經歷，在真考中真的沒有太多時間再怎麼分析了，讀不懂的話完全只能依靠10平時做題的感覺看哪個選項長得靚仔就速選算了。但V部份最後兩道題還是沒時間做，可能是一戰沒經驗吧，Sigh。。。

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-24 22:22

-- by 会员 GodMustBeCrazy (2010/7/24 1:20:41)

-- by 会员 cindybreakaway (2010/7/24 12:21:01)

[/quote]

其實10也是被期末考華麗的刪去了SC、CR的做題感覺，直接導致真考時遇到很大困難。
嗯，讓10 想一想，也許Cindy不必過多關注看題的數量，反而仔仔細細分析一定量而有代表性的題目可能幫助更大？而且如果OG的CR沒搞掂，麻木上GWD也許效果會大打折扣。或許Cindy可以嘗試挑出自己不理解的題目，在CD上搜索相關討論題，也許大牛的中文高見會讓Cindy醍醐灌頂（這個成語是不是這樣用，Confused）？

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-24 22:32

10.很谢谢你的耐心讲解。
RC，其实我在做OG12的时候，我每一篇都划了逻辑简图的（木木是我的范本），这几天定时做，一直只有50%的正确率。我觉得我有整体脉络，也会关键词定位，但是让我纠结的总是定位后，那句话和选项中的话意思一样，但是表达方式不一样，而有时重点单词，我又不晓得意思，所以总是2个选项间徘徊。
CR，正确率也差不多是一半，我觉得最重要的问题是理解，如果题读懂了，必对。否则比错。我是觉得CR还是有一定阅读量的，我是想问是够要用SC的方法，来抓主干，理脉络? sometimes or always i guess some words.

-- by 会员 417362919 (2010/7/24 17:21:13)

其實50%的正確率，在JJ幫助下，也足夠取得一個不錯的分數，你不必太擔心。但既然有提高的空間，我們CDers就要做得最好啦。
10似乎覺得，你是在選項和文段中同意轉換的理解出現小小問題？猜測是完全沒有問題的，絕大部份人都猜測吧，問題在於猜測得准不准。或者10這樣說，不懂的詞會影響文段理解嗎？如果影響理解，就應該要在做完題后。認真LookUp不確定的單詞了。
問題中的單詞比文段中更為重要，因為問題並沒有什麽上下文幫助理解，CDers應該保證能較好掌握GMAT RC問題中時常出現的詞和常見的同意轉換。
10不太瞭解什麽叫SC的方法。可以稍微解釋一下，增益10所不能嗎（掉書包了，自己都覺得Gross，呵呵）？

作者: cindybreakaway 时间: 2010-7-24 23:04
谢谢10，很感谢

可能是OG没消化好，今天想了一下，打算把OG 12再好好仔仔细细过一遍，看能不能突破CR。
之前复习的时候没怎么上CD，现在上了发觉资料太多了，有点不知道用哪些？但是看大牛们都是把OG作为王道，看来还是把OG再过多一遍（之前已过2遍）。
再次感谢10的耐心解答。
PS:醍醐灌顶你用对了！哈，有文化！

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-25 01:00

谢谢10，很感谢

-- by 会员 cindybreakaway (2010/7/24 23:04:25)

You're Welcome啦~也感謝Cindy耐心回答10弱智的成語問題
Cindy可以考虑使用10自己做的CR总结EXCEL按FEIFEI分類按不同類別做，就是連着做几十題Conclude题、几十題Weaken題這樣，可能會更有針對性地提高對CR的理解。

作者: miller811 时间: 2010-7-25 01:08
顶10
确实把OG按照题型分类来做，更容易培养CR的感觉。（我现在就正在这么做

）

作者: wutaoao 时间: 2010-7-25 06:48
牛人年年有啊，感谢10

作者: DennisLeBel 时间: 2010-7-25 11:41
你好,10. 看了你的阅读资料,包括第一轮笔记.其中看到你做第一题大概是3分钟,就是说包括了看文章.我想问一下你第一遍读文章的情况.主要指详略情况,比如文章中有,firstly,secondly...你会直告诉自己说这是某两个原因,而略去具体原因不读吗? 碰到ALTHOUGH,unless这些词你会特别停下记忆吗?当一段看完如果自己思路不清,有必要停下花点时间整理一下吗??

还有逻辑简图,我虽然读完能做出,但是我发现一个逻辑简图,我要花2分钟以上回想.也就是说,简图从未清晰印在我脑中,虽然我能回想起来,这种情况你有什么好的建议吗?
最近阅读发现碰到天体类,细胞物质类文章基本就一头雾水啊.第1遍看完大脑空空,对这类文章你有什么建议呢

哦差点忘了,补充一下,我的情况:YP难句基本上看懂了,感觉阅读句子基本没什么问题.但是看阅读时,有些文章像无头苍蝇般,不知不觉读了很多细节,就更不知道文章结构了.
希望10同学能给一些指点.不求面面俱到,但求点石成金了!

作者: 轻松熊 时间: 2010-7-25 12:35
我跟Dennis是一样的情况，希望10能给指点一下啊

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-25 19:40

你好,10. 看了你的阅读资料,包括第一轮笔记.其中看到你做第一题大概是3分钟,就是说包括了看文章.我想问一下你第一遍读文章的情况.主要指详略情况,比如文章中有,firstly,secondly...你会直告诉自己说这是某两个原因,而略去具体原因不读吗? 碰到ALTHOUGH,unless这些词你会特别停下记忆吗?当一段看完如果自己思路不清,有必要停下花点时间整理一下吗??

还有逻辑简图,我虽然读完能做出,但是我发现一个逻辑简图,我要花2分钟以上回想.也就是说,简图从未清晰印在我脑中,虽然我能回想起来,这种情况你有什么好的建议吗?
最近阅读发现碰到天体类,细胞物质类文章基本就一头雾水啊.第1遍看完大脑空空,对这类文章你有什么建议呢

哦差点忘了,补充一下,我的情况:YP难句基本上看懂了,感觉阅读句子基本没什么问题.但是看阅读时,有些文章像无头苍蝇般,不知不觉读了很多细节,就更不知道文章结构了.
希望10同学能给一些指点.不求面面俱到,但求点石成金了!

-- by 会员 DennisLeBel (2010/7/25 11:41:12)

不好意思，剛剛不在。Den, 3分鐘其實太短了。一般不適合CDers，合適的時間大概是（一篇文章的的題目數+1）分鐘.let me put it this way.一般RC是一道題分配兩分鐘，但其中一分鐘上交給文段，一分鐘留給看題目、定位、選擇答案。所以第一道題一般來說是包括所有題目的看文章時間和第一道題的做題時間。 2010-07-25 00:28:40

遇到Firstly這些詞我會快讀，而Although這些詞會較為細讀。看完一段無論思路清不清都一定要整理一下，總結段意，串聯文章。 2010-07-25 00:30:11

10的3分鐘其實是有一點特殊情況。因為複習的一開始10沒有立即打算為CDers做這樣一份資料的。我是從大概中段的Passage開始將計時填入EXCEL的，你可以找找，大概那些5、6分鐘的就是了。所以一開始幾篇文章的時間記錄已經遺失了。後來的是第二遍過小安的時間，所以有點偏快。10在這裡為誤導大家而道歉。 2010-07-25 00:32:58

如果邏輯簡圖要用2分鐘以上，就有點得不償失。除非Den有把握在多次訓練后迅速縮短整理時間，不然的話可以嘗試一下，每讀完一段用大概十多秒回想段意（時間充裕而已與上段稍微聯繫一下），讀完整篇文章后用大概半分鐘將每段大意串聯起來，結合成文章邏輯脈絡。注意這時一定要考慮一下這個邏輯必須符合作者的明顯態度，否則就應該出錯了。 2010-07-25 00:37:42

天體、地質、細胞類文章一直是廣大CDers心頭之痛（包括10），這些文章讀不懂某些專有名詞沒關係，會定位就好。一般文段難，題目就會稍微容易。Den你不用太擔心。而且如果到時有JJ相助，可謂事半功倍。 2010-07-25 00:40:03

細節不是第一遍閱讀時要仔細讀的，只要會定位就好。Den你一定要想辦法強迫自己在略讀過程中學會找出定位的關鍵字，看了考細節的題目后才根據定位回文章找相關信息。 2010-07-25 00:45:44

舉個剛剛Den你提到你例子。比如說Firstly、Secondly，重要的不是Firstly後面說的是什麽，而是到底作者要列舉什麽。而Firstly之後的內容只要記住關鍵的概括性的一兩個詞，或者一些特殊的詞比如"aha”之類的。這些都是便於定位的詞。 2010-07-25 00:45:46

Dennis不用太過擔心，認真地過小安閱讀法成效將是巨大的~
BTW,謝謝Dennis提醒了很多10在貼紙中所忽略的點。10可以把你提的問題和10的答覆貼在貼紙上以便CDers更好地理解嗎？ 2010-07-25 00:48:36

作者: byron8299 时间: 2010-7-25 20:15
楼主好人，很耐心很客观的解答，只是，只是繁体看得太累，呵呵！！
----GMAT新手留

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-25 20:20

楼主好人，很耐心很客观的解答，只是，只是繁体看得太累，呵呵！！
----GMAT新手留

-- by 会员 byron8299 (2010/7/25 20:15:39)

不好意思，Byron。主要是10平時用慣繁體了。如果實在難看懂的話，或許可以嘗試下Word的繁簡轉換？
其實10應該也是可以用簡體的，不過也有點點私心啦，因為我們那邊的CDers看簡體可能比大家看繁體還困難，So...就麻煩大家了~~~

作者: aaronjoqd 时间: 2010-7-25 21:07
10的勤奋，善良，谦逊，无私，太太太太让人感动了，太用心良苦了，superNN 期待你的新帖，支持你~~

作者: Ballet 时间: 2010-7-25 22:32
谢谢lz~~顶一个！

作者: cindybreakaway 时间: 2010-7-25 23:17

谢谢10，很感谢

-- by 会员 cindybreakaway (2010/7/24 23:04:25)

-- by 会员 GodMustBeCrazy (2010/7/25 1:00:40)

好！我今天发现有些weaken是对evidence有些是对conclusion。是这样的吗？
你太nice了！太好人了！

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-26 00:01

谢谢10，很感谢

-- by 会员 cindybreakaway (2010/7/24 23:04:25)

-- by 会员 GodMustBeCrazy (2010/7/25 1:00:40)

好！我今天发现有些weaken是对evidence有些是对conclusion。是这样的吗？
你太nice了！太好人了！

-- by 会员 cindybreakaway (2010/7/25 23:17:25)

厄，這點10還沒有注意過，覺得只要選項是Weaken就相關了。很有可能是這樣的，他因大概就是Cindy指的後者吧。不過Cindy應該不需要太看中這一點，因為GMAT只會有一個答案是符合Weaken作用的，不管是直接作用對Evidence還是對Conclusion。

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-26 00:03

10的勤奋，善良，谦逊，无私，太太太太让人感动了，太用心良苦了，superNN 期待你的新帖，支持你~~

-- by 会员 aaronjoqd (2010/7/25 21:07:14)

MM說得10太好了，搞到10都懷疑是不是自己特意申請一個馬甲專門夸自己。
其實10是一個壞人來的。呵呵。
謝謝MM對10的支持哦，10會繼續努力的，你也加油哦~

作者: byron8299 时间: 2010-7-26 13:29

楼主好人，很耐心很客观的解答，只是，只是繁体看得太累，呵呵！！
----GMAT新手留

-- by 会员 byron8299 (2010/7/25 20:15:39)

-- by 会员 GodMustBeCrazy (2010/7/25 20:20:07)

Just kidding, 都是中国字，看起来一样熟悉！！

作者: hjc1231105 时间: 2010-7-26 13:39
辛苦楼楼啦

作者: yoyoz7 时间: 2010-7-26 20:35
非常非常感谢楼主！~大善人也

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-26 20:49
Farewell, Raul.
From now on, 10 will never watch a single match of Real Madrid, ever.

作者: karenxie 时间: 2010-7-27 15:53

楼主好人，很耐心很客观的解答，只是，只是繁体看得太累，呵呵！！
----GMAT新手留

-- by 会员 byron8299 (2010/7/25 20:15:39)

看到这样的说法，就好比：人家辛辛苦苦煮了一大锅的美食，路人免费来吃，吃完了还要来句“环境不好没空调太热了”。不知道OFFICE里面可以繁简转换吗？自己1秒钟可以搞定的事情，哎。
厚道点对待人家的无私分享吧，不说感恩戴德，至少也要感谢啊。
当然我不是针对谁，大家只是路人而已，只是在这样一个分享的精华帖里看到这样的话，觉得对楼主不公平。

另外，非常感谢10的无私分享，祝你一切顺利~

作者: meixiang 时间: 2010-7-27 22:32
真是好贴
顶

作者: cdl010633 时间: 2010-7-27 22:38
非常感谢！！！

作者: madonna 时间: 2010-7-27 22:39
Reading是XDF費允杰的CR閱讀方法。其中，"A" stands for "to accept", and "C" for "to criticize"

什么意思

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-28 00:05

楼主好人，很耐心很客观的解答，只是，只是繁体看得太累，呵呵！！
----GMAT新手留

-- by 会员 byron8299 (2010/7/25 20:15:39)

-- by 会员 karenxie (2010/7/27 15:53:09)

其實Byron可能也是小小抱怨一下。10以前也經常抱怨的，呵呵。
不過10真的真的很感激Karen的支持。大家GMAT加油！！！

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-28 00:10

Reading是XDF費允杰的CR閱讀方法。其中，"A" stands for "to accept", and "C" for "to criticize"

什么意思

-- by 会员 madonna (2010/7/27 22:39:06)

10一直在等待這樣的一個問題。謝謝madonna~~~
這兩種都是狒狒提出對不同題目採用的不同閱讀方法，在狒狒的邏輯總結上有提及。"to accept"指完全接受文章信息，包括"Co""Ex""Ro""Fi"；"to criticize"指帶有批判性地看文章信息，需要時找出文章邏輯漏洞，包括"We""St""Ev""As"。
事實上10後來覺得這兩種方法的用處也沒有狒狒強調的那麼大，邏輯最關鍵應該還是讀懂文章的意思~

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-28 00:21
嗯，另外10要在這裡向大家小道一下歉。
因為下一封要幫大家做一個粗略的G複習計劃，需要更多的考慮，而且10最近比較忙，另外也在為CDers補做一份新的資料，所以這兩天都無法更新。不過10很快會著手弄的了。
再次謝謝大家對10的支持~

作者: madonna 时间: 2010-7-28 09:48

Reading是XDF費允杰的CR閱讀方法。其中，"A" stands for "to accept", and "C" for "to criticize"

什么意思

-- by 会员 madonna (2010/7/27 22:39:06)

-- by 会员 GodMustBeCrazy (2010/7/28 0:10:31)

cheers^

另外我想了解一下你逻辑是怎么修炼的。我现在的情况是做OG12每20道错6-7题，并且做题速度很慢。我自己认为是阅读没理解好。如果按照你提供的EXCEL，根据不同类型的题来练习熟悉而不是像OG那样混杂一起，会不会更好呢？多提提宝贵意见哈 ^ ^

作者: Savanah 时间: 2010-7-28 18:14
Thanks for your great effort

作者: ffffighting 时间: 2010-7-28 21:09
太赞了~~狂顶~~~

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-28 22:18
[attach]79160[/attach]

太赞了~~狂顶~~~

-- by 会员 ffffighting (2010/7/28 21:09:54)

再次謝謝大家對10的支持。
其實10一開始做Sum of OG 11 SC是希望CDers可以用Correct Sentences來複習OG10，OG12的SC，然後再使用OG11的SC總結，這樣不完全重複地過OG SC可能效果會更好，但是從CDers的下載數目來看，OG 11還是相對被冷落了，也有CDers和10反映說，似乎OG11有點Out-of-Date，更希望使用OG12的總結來複習SC。
於是，10就抽空用類似Sum of OG 11 SC的方法做出了Sum of OG 12 SC，希望能更好地幫助CDers。由於做這份資料而耽誤【十.封.信.】的推出也請大家原諒。加油加油加油！！！

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-28 23:48

Reading是XDF費允杰的CR閱讀方法。其中，"A" stands for "to accept", and "C" for "to criticize"

什么意思

-- by 会员 madonna (2010/7/27 22:39:06)

-- by 会员 GodMustBeCrazy (2010/7/28 0:10:31)

-- by 会员 madonna (2010/7/28 9:48:12)

修煉聽起來有點像ChineseKongfu，呵呵。
10自己花在CR上的時間相對較少，只是先按順序過了一遍OG10和OG12的CR，再簡略地用自己做的Sum分類別再過一遍。衝刺階段GWD都沒有怎麼看CR分類了。但10一開始CR就相對較強，可能是因為題意讀得比較清晰吧。
分類做應該是會對CR各類題的感覺更強，但至於到底CR過幾輪就要視乎CDers自身情況了（目標、水平、時間）。就像10在CR總結中所提到的，如果OG過兩遍的話，還是建議第一遍按順序，第二遍按分類。
10覺得最關鍵的還是做完之後的分析，不僅要讀透OG解釋，自己還要有意識地避免再犯類似的錯誤。

作者: wanlin26 时间: 2010-7-29 11:09
thanks a lot

作者: GodMustBeCrazy 时间: 2010-7-29 23:11
終於的終於，10總算完成十封信了。
但這絕對不是【十.封.信.】這個系列的結束。
正如10在第一封信中所說，10會一直守在貼紙上，儘自己所能回答CDers的疑問并針對大家的反饋做必要修改。
在這裡再次感謝大家對10的支持。事實上10從CD獲得得太多，這不過是小小的回報而已。
希望CDers都能考出理想的成績。

作者: miller811 时间: 2010-7-30 00:24
10 看的我都湿了希望你以后能有好的发展
另外我想问问我现在该如何准备
今天prep有740了所以准备报名5号的考试请问最后这几天该做些什么呢还有就是prep的难度和实战差多少呢

作者: hopezhung 时间: 2010-7-30 03:33
赞一个

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)