ChaseDream

标题: GWD T-4-Q21 大侠进来看看啊~~~ [打印本页]

作者: selenehs1989 时间: 2010-7-18 21:47
标题: GWD T-4-Q21 大侠进来看看啊~~~

The OLEX Petroleum Company has recently determined that it could cut its refining costs by closing its Grenville refinery and consolidating all refining at its Tasberg refinery. Closing the Grenville refinery, however, would mean the immediate loss of about 1,200 jobs in the Grenville area. Eventually the lives of more than 10,000 people would be seriously disrupted. Therefore, OLEX’s decision, announced yesterday, to keep Grenville open shows that at OLEX social concerns sometimes outweigh the desire for higher profits.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument given?

A. The Grenville refinery, although it operates at a higher cost than the Tasberg refinery, has nevertheless been moderately profitable for many years.

B. Even though OLEX could consolidate all its refining at the Tasberg plant, doing so at the Grenville plant would not be feasible.

C. The Tasberg refinery is more favorably situated than the Grenville refinery with respect to the major supply routes for raw petroleum.

D. If the Grenville refinery were ever closed and operations at the Tasberg refinery expanded, job openings at Tasberg would to the extent possible be filled with people formerly employed at Grenville.
E. Closure of the Grenville refinery would mean compliance, at enormous cost, with demanding local codes regulating the cleanup of abandoned industrial sites.

答案是E 可是D怎么错了原文说减少cost而去关闭G，而关闭G会带来社会问题，结论是考虑到社会问题要继续开G。D说可以关闭G因为T会解决关闭G带来的失业问题，不也是削弱了结论么？？

还是其他别的什么的请大侠共同探讨

作者: haonan15110 时间: 2010-7-18 22:09
题目说most seriously undermines，E选项更直接地反驳了原推论。

作者: selenehs1989 时间: 2010-7-18 22:28
哦谢了那D我分析的没错吧如果没有E选项D是不是就对了啊~~

作者: bennywang2usa 时间: 2010-7-18 23:41
没有E，D也是个无关选项！

因为原文说，不关闭G了，体现了O的社会责任感。

但是D和这个结论没有关系。

作者: hnluluowen 时间: 2010-8-8 05:49

没有E，D也是个无关选项！

因为原文说，不关闭G了，体现了O的社会责任感。

但是D和这个结论没有关系。

-- by 会员 bennywang2usa (2010/7/18 23:41:07)

我觉得D 不是无关选项啊！
关闭G，会造成JOB LOSS，这样就没有社会责任感，所以公司不关闭G,
但是D说如果关闭G，根本就不会造成JOB LOSS，所以就不会没有社会责任感，所以公司不关闭G根本就不是因为考虑到社会责任感啊！
这不是很明显的削弱吗？

作者: doreen125 时间: 2010-8-8 09:21
我觉得你对D选项衍生太多了~E直接就可以得到结论~

作者: sallyremy 时间: 2011-10-28 23:40

没有E，D也是个无关选项！

因为原文说，不关闭G了，体现了O的社会责任感。

但是D和这个结论没有关系。

-- by 会员 bennywang2usa (2010/7/18 23:41:07)

-- by 会员 hnluluowen (2010/8/8 5:49:57)

我觉得有道理啊！有没有人解一下D选项！！

作者: yqhpsyche 时间: 2012-3-9 20:49
把这个帖翻出来了....同LZ...觉得D是有关的...请NN解释~~

作者: 翠儿卡 时间: 2012-3-21 22:30

把这个帖翻出来了....同LZ...觉得D是有关的...请NN解释~~

-- by 会员 yqhpsyche (2012/3/9 20:49:00)

仔细再看这题，突然发现还有一句“Eventuallythe lives of more than 10,000 people would be seriously disrupted.”，而D中T的作用只能维持G原来的那些人——如果是这样的话侧面说明T达不到需要的社会效益，所以其实是加强吧？

作者: yikou 时间: 2012-5-5 16:54
同问D

作者: gabrielvon 时间: 2013-10-22 16:08

sallyremy 发表于 2011-10-28 23:40
没有E，D也是个无关选项！因为原文说，不关闭G了，体现了O的社会责任感。但是D和这个结论没有关系。- ...

撑楼主呀。up up up up

作者: imlululu 时间: 2014-7-4 20:51
我也错选了D

作者: 山贼的头头 时间: 2014-7-4 22:22
to keep Grenville open shows that at OLEX social concerns sometimes outweigh the desire for higher profits.
这才是结论，问削弱。
D永远都不会对。D 推出的结论是可以关闭G，因为G的关闭不会导致失业。问削弱是削弱 shows that at OLEX social concerns sometimes outweigh the desire for higher profits而不是keep G open.你读题有问题

作者: tjwen93 时间: 2014-8-13 15:04
结论：OLEX认为social concerns重要于profits
削弱：profits重要于social concerns
E里面考虑到关闭要付很多钱，所以不关闭。说明企业在纠结钱的问题
D选项，首先没有提到Profits,而且说G下岗的工人可以去T上班，那更应该关闭G了。和OLEX公司最后宣布的结果相反

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)