ChaseDream

标题: gwd-1-16 弱问。。。关于比较。。。 [打印本页]

作者: fannybeibei 时间: 2010-7-16 21:15
标题: gwd-1-16 弱问。。。关于比较。。。
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.
A. a greater proportion than it was
B. a greater proportion than
C. a greater proportion than they have been
D. which is greater than was so
E. which is greater than it has been

选B
我不明白为什么A的it不可以指代portion，
a greater proportion than it （the portion) was in any previous election,然后这样的话，我觉得A还挺对的～

B省略了什么呢？什么情况下可以这么大手笔的省呢？我觉得还原就是the portion was 啊。。。求指教！

作者: 姿姿不倦 时间: 2010-7-16 21:27
我乍一看也会直奔A去了。。
要补出是因为不补的话比较成分不一样造成歧义
这样推理下来
是不是因为这里就是proportion和proportion比？
比的东西一模一样就不在于省略什么又还原什么了。。

作者: fannybeibei 时间: 2010-7-16 21:40
再次谢谢mm啦～～

关于这个我有个反例啊，PREP-2-49 Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950.

这里it就是对的说。。。

不明白。。。。。。。。。。。

作者: 姿姿不倦 时间: 2010-7-16 22:01
如果这里没有it 就变成
the global economy has grown more than the 10000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950.
那么就是全球经济和一万年比了。
其实比的对象是全球经济的增长。。

作者: fannybeibei 时间: 2010-7-16 22:20
对啊，有道理

不过这里more than it did 就不算economy 和economy在比么？还是有些不清楚。。。

作者: 姿姿不倦 时间: 2010-7-16 22:23
因为你补出来了it did 你才清楚了是economy 和 economy在比么就不会有上面那个经济和一万年比的歧义了啊

作者: 姿姿不倦 时间: 2010-7-16 22:24
不过我对你最先贴的题还是有点不确定。我是说我的分析啦。哎我飘走看作文去啦。

作者: fannybeibei 时间: 2010-7-16 22:25
哦，好吧，加油～

作者: fannybeibei 时间: 2010-7-16 22:25
最先贴的题还是对的～

作者: yxs157 时间: 2010-7-16 22:26
弄清楚比较对象就好了，把分析想简单点，不要钻太深，考试也容不得你这么想，

这是时间状语 in xxx 和 in xxx的比较，其他的多余部分都要省掉

作者: fannybeibei 时间: 2010-7-16 22:30
可是。。。a greater proportion than in any previous election
这前一部分并没有时间状语in xxx 出现呀。。。

好吧。。。诶。。。我确实还一直想蛮多的。。。。。。。。。。。真是很无聊的癖好啊。。。

作者: yxs157 时间: 2010-7-17 17:20

可是。。。a greater proportion than in any previous election
这前一部分并没有时间状语in xxx 出现呀。。。

好吧。。。诶。。。我确实还一直想蛮多的。。。。。。。。。。。真是很无聊的癖好啊。。。

-- by 会员 fannybeibei (2010/7/16 22:30:27)

怎么没有？in the presidential campaign of 1992

作者: fannybeibei 时间: 2010-7-17 19:37
哦，对哦，看到了。。。～～～

作者: yuanjolly 时间: 2010-7-17 20:24
if insistin using the than it was, it should use than it costed or it did to be parallel,,,,,,,,,,,,

作者: fannybeibei 时间: 2010-7-17 20:30

if insistin using the than it was, it should use than it costed or it did to be parallel,,,,,,,,,,,,

-- by 会员 yuanjolly (2010/7/17 20:24:29)

IMO, if "it" refers to " proportion" instead of "costs", i think "it was" is fine~~~

作者: Gembraco 时间: 2010-7-18 00:59
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.
A. a greater proportion than it was
B. a greater proportion than
C. a greater proportion than they have been
D. which is greater than was so
E. which is greater than it has been

a greater proportion than (the porportion television costs accounted for ) in any previous election

要比较的话，是名词proportion和名词proportion之间的比较，因此 it was, they have been无法指代省略的内容

作者: gracefighting 时间: 2010-7-18 08:58
a greater proportion 实际上是 half the spending 的同位语，你把它替换进去

soaring television costs accounted for a greater proportion in the presidential campaign of 1922 than (**** costs accounted for the proportion ) in any previous election.

按这个结构的话，it 指代的是costs , was 也就不对了

这题重点在于 a greater proportion 实际上是句子宾语的同位语，就是说它做宾语，又怎么能 was呢

作者: fannybeibei 时间: 2010-7-18 20:37
哦，终于弄懂了，谢谢LS两位了～～～～～～～～～～～

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)