标题: 大全 10 [打印本页] 作者: heygika 时间: 2010-7-2 22:42 标题: 大全 10 10. A large rise in the number of housing starts in the coming year should boost new construction dollars by several billion dollars, making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago. (A) making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago (B) and make the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago (C) making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than it was five years ago (D) to make the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago（C） (E) in making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than it as five years ago
我知道A错在哪里。 C用了it was five years ago，prep2的96题说，用it/they指代句子前面出现过的事物时，精确指代前文出现的该特定事物，该事物的修饰成分、特性均被继承在it/they当中： more than ten times as much energy is generated through wind power now as it was in 1990. it指代现在通过电能产生的energy...
请教请教到底应该是怎样……作者: Luxe 时间: 2010-7-2 23:28
我觉得如果是making的话，应该是修饰的前面的整个句子，从逻辑上讲是A large rise in the number of housing starts in the coming year使得建筑业更加鲁棒， 个人感觉应该选B。不知道对不对，呵呵作者: heygika 时间: 2010-7-4 23:34
如今都没人答题了作者: heygika 时间: 2010-7-31 05:38
快一个月了，继续顶这个问题…… 因为发现好多地方都出现这个用法了。作者: chris5105077 时间: 2010-9-3 14:24
这题我怎么觉得解释是错的，making显然应该修饰主句的主语吧，修饰的是A rise吧？
