ChaseDream

标题: 狒狒逻辑宝典第21题自我解析(趁记忆尚热赶紧做文抄公) [打印本页]

作者: michael79    时间: 2010-7-2 14:30
标题: 狒狒逻辑宝典第21题自我解析(趁记忆尚热赶紧做文抄公)
照例先给题:

Historian: We can learn about the medical history of individuals through chemical analysis of their hair. It is likely, for example, that Isaac Newton’s psychological problems were due to mercury poisoning; traces of mercury were found in his hair. Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven’s hair. Although no convincing argument has shown that Beethoven ever had a venereal disease, some people hypothesize that venereal disease caused his deafness. Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven’s time to treat venereal disease, if researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the historian’s argument depends?

A.    None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.
B.    Some people in Beethoven’s time did not ingest mercury.
C.    Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease.
D.    Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease.
E.    Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton’s.

我选了A,凭感觉,自以为挺“符合逻辑”的。
答案是B。
英文的标准答案写的模糊,没整明白。
还是lawyer大神的思路让我茅塞顿开。

这题属于assumption类中的必要型。总体方法是将选项取非(坛子里也就叫取反的)。

B选项“Some people in Beethoven’s time did not ingest mercury"取非的话,就变成:

None people in Beethoven’s time did not ingest mercury

根据双否即肯定的普适原理,上述statement也就是all people  in Beethoven’s time ingest mercury,当然与作者结论不符合:如果老贝时代大家都吞水银,那么就无法根据头发中的水银含量来”about the medical history of individuals “。

出题人的陷阱是把”Some people in Beethoven’s time  ingested mercury. “拧巴成现在样子,迷惑考生。

最后说说这里(对于我而言的)生词:

venereal disease:性病
ingest:摄入。

不过做题时这些生词不影响阅读。
作者: ray_shenchen    时间: 2010-7-2 17:25
venereal disease:性病

+1
作者: 记忆钢琴    时间: 2010-7-3 12:40
很强大~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3