ChaseDream

标题: [求助] OG12-SC-Q7 [打印本页]

作者: harmonica 时间: 2010-6-29 16:33
标题: [求助] OG12-SC-Q7
Asits sales of computer products have surpassed those of measuring instruments,the company has become increasingly willing to compete for the mass marketsales they would in the past have conceded to rivals.
(A) they would in the past have conceded to rivals
(B) they would have conceded previously to their rivals
(C) that in the past would have been conceded previously to rivals
(D) it previously would have conceded to rivals in the past
~~(E)~~ it would in the past have conceded to rivals

OG的解释看明白了，但是想问一下"have conceded"的主语是谁?

作者: kenhu 时间: 2010-6-29 16:52
当然是it了，也就是company

作者: megoliu 时间: 2010-7-24 14:24
我对楼上的解释表示一点质疑，如果是it，那么应该是has。我觉得have conceded的主语应该是 sales，把sales 让步给竞争者。

作者: wangsiwei 时间: 2010-7-24 14:26
would have--虚拟

作者: loverwy 时间: 2010-7-24 15:25
mass market sales (it would in the past have conceded to rivals)

其实，it would in the past have conceded to rivals 做定语修饰mass market sales, 完整的应该是：

It (the company) would in the past have conceded (the mass market sales) to rivals.

作者: 淡水河边 时间: 2010-7-29 12:50
IT指company，因为用would表示一种可能或是意愿，虚拟语气，所以后面用have。

作者: yaoyaojoe 时间: 2010-9-21 15:18
标题: 弱问定语从句中的关系代词什么情况下可以省？

mass market sales (it would in the past have conceded to rivals)

其实，it would in the past have conceded to rivals 做定语修饰mass market sales, 完整的应该是：

It (the company) would in the past have conceded (the mass market sales) to rivals.

-- by 会员 loverwy (2010/7/24 15:25:33)

作定语，定语从句中的关系代词which，that什么时候可以省略？

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)