ChaseDream

标题: 问GWD6-Q14 [打印本页]

作者: zhyyts    时间: 2010-6-24 14:40
标题: 问GWD6-Q14
Political Advertisement:

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership.Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office.So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?


?The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.

?Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.

?Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.

?The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.

?The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.
答案选D,可是D说的是eliminate的pay,和留下人的pay没有直接关系啊?多谢大家

作者: stefaniekid    时间: 2010-6-27 17:49
广告说average paycheck增加了
average paycheck=总的pay/总人数
总pay增加 或总人数减少都可以使average paycheck上升
总pay=以前数+任期增加数-任期减少数
题目中说新增工作的pay比以前的要高,而D说减少的工作的pay和以前一样 这样总pay就多了
就加强了广告的说法




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3