标题: GWD一题怎末都想不明白，请NN帮忙看看 [打印本页] 作者: vbdjulia 时间: 2010-6-20 13:08 标题: GWD一题怎末都想不明白，请NN帮忙看看 T-3-Q13. The traditional treatment of strep infections has been a seven-day course of antibiotics, either penicillin or erythromycin. However, since many patients stop taking those drugs within three days, reinfection is common in cases where these drugs are prescribed. A new antibiotic requires only a three-day course of treatment. Therefore, reinfection will probably be less common in cases where the new antibiotic is prescribed than in cases where either penicillin or erythromycin is prescribed.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A. Some of people who are allergic to penicillin are likely to be allergic to the new antibiotic. B. A course of treatment with the new antibiotic costs about the same as a course of treatment with either penicillin or erythromycin. C. The new antibiotic has been shown to be effective in eradicating bacterial infections other than strep. D. Some physicians have already begun to prescribe the new antibiotic instead of penicillin or erythromycin for the treatment of some strep infections E. Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one, most patients feel fully recovered after taking the drug for three days. 答案是E，我怎末都不理解它到底是如何加强了结论，我选的D，但看解释说像D这种强加Expert作法的肯定不对，Why?困惑啊。。。作者: zzqiang215 时间: 2010-6-20 13:35
题干: 论据:1,旧药7天治愈 ,但很多病人3天就停旧药, 导致发生病症复发 2,新药疗程只要3天 结论:新药可以减少复发
D, 医生开始开新药取代旧药,并不一定意味着新药就能减少复发. E, 加强了论据1, 因为如果想要证明结论, 应该还要说明使用新药情况下, 病人不会提早停药. 原论据1只是说明了旧药情况,病人3天停药;但没有说明新药下,病人是否行为有变化,假如新药下,病人使用2天就停,那么新药也减少不了复发了.
-- by 会员 zzqiang215 (2010/6/20 13:35:35)
先谢过LS,可D我觉得既然医生都推荐新药了，证明新药确实比老药有效，所以加强。E选项本身Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one, 我不会想到是在限定使用时间这一要素。作者: vbdjulia 时间: 2010-6-20 21:58
Up作者: keith139 时间: 2010-6-20 22:16
我觉得吧，d是因为只是some。 而且复发是有名堂的，如果说在旧药还没有用到规定的7天的时候，病人感染还没好时，能够叫复发。那么新药在还没有用到规定期限3天的时候，比如说1天，他们就觉得还没有好也叫复发，那么病人会认为新药也没有用。e就说了一般3天是大家假定的心理治愈期限，这样新药本身就能3天搞定病症，所以不会引起复发 其实这个题似乎是assumption