标题: 老PREP-2-29 请大家帮助，希望一起理清知识点 谢谢了 [打印本页] 作者: fannybeibei 时间: 2010-6-5 14:21 标题: 老PREP-2-29 请大家帮助，希望一起理清知识点 谢谢了 Unlike many United States cities, where a river is no longer the focal point of urban life, the river in San Antonio winds through the middle of the business district, and the River Walk, or Paseo del Rio, is the city's most popular attraction. (A) Unlike many United States cities, where a river is no longer the focal point of urban life, the river in San Antonio (B) Unlike the river in many cities in the United States, which is no longer the focal point of urban life, in San Antonio the river (C) Today the river in many cities in the United States is no longer the focal point of urban life, unlike San Antonio, where it (D) In few United States cities today, a river is the focal point of urban life, but the river in San Antonio (E) No longer do many cities in the United States have a river as the focal point of urban life, but in San Antonio the river
和前辈们的讨论有点不同，因为我选了B...
希望借此理清几个知识点 1.有前辈们说B的比较对象不一致，可是，我认为，in San Antonio是状语， 并非比较对象，B确实是river 与river的比较，请问这样想对么？ 2.我认为B的错误在Unlike the river in many cities in the United States, 没有必要特指，请问这样想对么？ 3.E是倒装，那么XDF的原句不倒装，选项不要随便倒装，就是错误的么？ 4.which的跳跃修饰，由于中心词rivers后面是状语in many cities in the United States，其实这样跳跃不见得有歧义或是可作为排除依据， 请问这样想对么？
也欢迎其他TX继续评论作者: chaneldl 时间: 2010-6-15 09:36
A：比较对象错误 B：the river特指错误；which错误地指代了US C：比较对象错误；the river in many cities in the United States is no longer the focal point of urban life好像在说某一个特定的river不再是很多城市life的focal point了 D：In few United States cities today, a river is the focal point of urban life, 这种反向的表达方式其实改变了原意。 表示在极少的cities里river是focal point（few），原句是说在很多cities里面river已经不再是focal point（no longer）作者: chaneldl 时间: 2010-6-15 09:37
补充：个人认为E中的the river也不太好，但是相比较而言还是选E作者: pansean 时间: 2010-6-15 12:13
1.有前辈们说B的比较对象不一致，可是，我认为，in San Antonio是状语， 并非比较对象，B确实是river 与river的比较，请问这样想对么？ 2.我认为B的错误在Unlike the river in many cities in the United States, 没有必要特指，请问这样想对么？ 3.E是倒装，那么XDF的原句不倒装，选项不要随便倒装，就是错误的么？ 4.which的跳跃修饰，由于中心词rivers后面是状语in many cities in the United States，其实这样跳跃不见得有歧义或是可作为排除依据， 请问这样想对么？ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.我看完也有同样疑惑，倾向于同意你的观点 2.我觉得是对的，确实没特指 3.套硬规则经多次做题发觉是不保险，一切从句子实际出发，就好像之前有人常说出现being必错，但其实也有对的 4.这里有修饰歧义修了US，我做题时，选跳跃修饰选项是建立在其他项错误明显的前提下。。。另外如果跳跃修，我觉得会把river后面的状语都变成复数避免歧义
